Reid C M, Yeater R A, Ullrich I H
Br J Sports Med. 1987 Mar;21(1):40-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.21.1.40.
Forty-five men (18-35 years) trained three times a week for eight weeks to determine the effects of four constant-resistant weight training programmes on muscular strength, endurance, body composition and cardiovascular functioning. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four programmes: Endurance (2 sets of 15 repetition maximum [RM]); Explosive (1 set of 15 RM); Strength 1 (3 sets of 6 RM); Strength 2 (1 set of 10 RM twice weekly and 1 set of 3 RM once weekly). All groups showed significant increases in elbow and shoulder flexion strength with elbow extension strength improved in the Explosive, Strength 2 and Endurance groups. Shoulder extension strength improved the Endurance group and in the Strength 2 group. Maximum oxygen uptake (L/min) and (ml X kg-1 min-1) improved significantly in the Endurance and Strength 2 groups. Lean body weight increased significantly in all groups except the Strength 1 group, but there was no change in % fat for any group. Due to a high drop out rate (55%) and injury related problems, the Explosive technique is not recommended. The Endurance and Strength 2 programmes were most effective for improving physiologic functioning, as assessed in this study.
45名年龄在18至35岁之间的男性每周训练三次,持续八周,以确定四种固定阻力重量训练方案对肌肉力量、耐力、身体成分和心血管功能的影响。受试者被随机分配到四个方案中的一个:耐力训练(2组,每组15次最大重复量[RM]);爆发力训练(1组,每组15 RM);力量训练1(3组,每组6 RM);力量训练2(每周两次,每组10 RM,每周一次,每组3 RM)。所有组的肘部和肩部屈曲力量均显著增加,爆发力组、力量训练2组和耐力组的肘部伸展力量也有所改善。耐力组和力量训练2组的肩部伸展力量有所提高。耐力组和力量训练2组的最大摄氧量(L/min)和(ml×kg-1 min-1)显著提高。除力量训练1组外,所有组的瘦体重均显著增加,但各组的体脂百分比均无变化。由于高退出率(55%)和与受伤相关的问题,不推荐使用爆发力训练技术。如本研究评估所示,耐力训练和力量训练2方案对改善生理功能最为有效。