• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间的非言语神经认知评估:个人防护装备的影响。

Nonverbal Neurocognitive Assessment during the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Pandemic: the Effect of Personal Protective Equipment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct 19;37(7):1628-1632. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac044.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac044
PMID:35809337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9278219/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic has increased personal protective equipment (PPE) use in medical settings. The current study examined the effect of PPE on a nonverbal measure of neurocognitive functioning.

METHODS

The Leiter International Performance Scale, Third Edition (Leiter-3) was administered to 125 children between the ages of three and eight. Fifty-nine children were assessed twice without any PPE and 66 were assessed once without and once with PPE. Group differences on composite scores were evaluated using a repeated measures design, accounting for sex, school attendance, socioeconomic status, and HIV status.

RESULTS

Nonverbal IQ scores increased significantly between test administrations for both groups, but no significant interaction between PPE group and scores on Leiter-3 composites was found.

CONCLUSIONS

No main effect of PPE on Leiter-3 outcomes was found. These results suggest clinical and research work using a nonverbal neurocognitive assessment can be completed when PPE is required.

摘要

目的

2019 年冠状病毒病大流行增加了医疗环境中个人防护设备(PPE)的使用。本研究考察了 PPE 对神经认知功能的非言语测量的影响。

方法

对 125 名 3 至 8 岁的儿童进行了 Leiter 国际绩效量表第三版(Leiter-3)的测试。59 名儿童两次评估时未佩戴任何 PPE,66 名儿童一次评估时未佩戴 PPE,一次评估时佩戴了 PPE。使用重复测量设计,根据性别、上学情况、社会经济地位和 HIV 状况,评估组间复合评分的差异。

结果

两组的非言语智商评分在测试之间均显著增加,但 PPE 组与 Leiter-3 复合评分之间未发现显著交互作用。

结论

未发现 PPE 对 Leiter-3 结果有主要影响。这些结果表明,当需要使用个人防护设备时,可以进行使用非言语神经认知评估的临床和研究工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d1/9582159/06a1b6348135/acac044f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d1/9582159/06a1b6348135/acac044f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d1/9582159/06a1b6348135/acac044f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Nonverbal Neurocognitive Assessment during the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Pandemic: the Effect of Personal Protective Equipment.2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间的非言语神经认知评估:个人防护装备的影响。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct 19;37(7):1628-1632. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac044.
2
Nonverbal cognitive assessment of children in Tanzania with and without HIV.对坦桑尼亚感染艾滋病毒和未感染艾滋病毒儿童的非语言认知评估。
Child Neuropsychol. 2022 Jan;28(1):107-119. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2021.1957809. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Human Factor Considerations in Using Personal Protective Equipment in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context: Binational Survey Study.新冠疫情背景下使用个人防护装备的人为因素考量:双边调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 17;22(6):e19947. doi: 10.2196/19947.
4
What Have We Learnt About the Sourcing of Personal Protective Equipment During Pandemics? Leadership and Management in Healthcare Supply Chain Management: A Scoping Review.我们从大流行期间个人防护设备的采购中学到了什么?医疗供应链管理中的领导力和管理:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;9:765501. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.765501. eCollection 2021.
5
Through Their Eyes: Health Care Worker Compliance With Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.从他们的视角看:新冠疫情大流行期间医护人员对个人防护装备的遵从情况。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2021;36(4):294-301. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000584.
6
The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics' attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.个人防护设备的使用不会对护理人员的注意力和灵活性产生负面影响:一项前瞻性三交叉随机对照非劣效性试验。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 10;30(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3.
7
Personal protective equipment training for non-healthcare workers in the Covid-19 pandemic: Effectiveness of an evidence-based skills training framework.新冠疫情期间非医护人员的个人防护设备培训:基于证据的技能培训框架的效果。
Infect Dis Health. 2022 Feb;27(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
Does the COVID-19 personal protective equipment impair the surgeon's performance?新冠病毒个人防护装备是否会影响外科医生的操作表现?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):1989-1997. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04416-2. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
9
Personal protective equipment preparedness in Asia-Pacific intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A multinational survey.《2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间亚太地区重症监护病房个人防护设备准备情况:一项多国调查》。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Mar;34(2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
10
Changes in Personal Protective Equipment Usage Among Healthcare Personnel From the Beginning of Pandemic to Intra-COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand.泰国大流行期间至 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员个人防护设备使用的变化。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jun 6;67(5):637-649. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad015.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between HIV and reading performance for children in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚儿童中艾滋病病毒与阅读能力之间的关系。
AIDS. 2025 Jan 1;39(1):49-56. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004020. Epub 2024 Sep 18.