Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 10;30(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread use of personal protection equipment (PPE), including filtering face piece (FFP) masks, throughout the world. PPE. Previous studies indicate that PPE impairs neurocognitive performance in healthcare workers. Concerns for personnel safety have led to special recommendations regarding basic life support (BLS) in patients with a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the use of PPE. Established instruments are available to assess attention and dexterity in BLS settings, respectively. We aimed to evaluate the influence of PPE with different types of FFP masks on these two neuropsychological components of EMS personnel during BLS.
This was a randomized controlled non-inferiority triple-crossover study. Teams of paramedics completed three 12-min long BLS scenarios on a manikin after having climbed three flights of stairs with equipment, each in three experimental conditions: (a) without pandemic PPE, (b) with PPE including a FFP2 mask with an expiration valve and (c) with PPE including an FFP2 mask without an expiration valve. The teams and intervention sequences were randomized. We measured the shift in concentration performance using the d2 test and dexterity using the nine-hole peg test (NHPT). We compared results between the three conditions. For the primary outcome, the non-inferiority margin was set at 20 points.
Forty-eight paramedics participated. Concentration performance was significantly better after each scenario, with no differences noted between groups: d2 shift control versus with valve - 8.3 (95% CI - 19.4 to 2.7) points; control versus without valve - 8.5 (- 19.7 to 2.7) points; with valve versus without valve 0.1 (- 11.1 to 11.3) points. Similar results were found for the NHPT: + 0.3 (- 0.7 to 1.4), - 0.4 (- 1.4 to 0.7), 0.7 (- 0.4 to 1.8) s respectively.
Attention increases when performing BLS. Attention and dexterity are not inferior when wearing PPE, including FFP2 masks. PPE should be used on a low-threshold basis.
COVID-19 大流行导致世界各地广泛使用个人防护设备(PPE),包括过滤面罩(FFP)口罩。先前的研究表明,PPE 会损害医护人员的神经认知表现。出于对人员安全的关注,针对有潜在 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险的患者的基本生命支持(BLS)提出了特殊建议,包括使用 PPE。目前已有评估 BLS 环境下注意力和灵巧性的既定工具。我们旨在评估不同类型的 FFP 口罩对 EMS 人员在 BLS 期间这两个神经心理学组成部分的影响。
这是一项随机对照非劣效性三交叉研究。一组 EMT 人员在携带设备爬完三层楼梯后,在人体模型上完成了三个 12 分钟长的 BLS 场景,每个场景都在三种实验条件下进行:(a)不使用大流行 PPE,(b)使用包括带呼气阀的 FFP2 口罩的 PPE,以及(c)使用不包括呼气阀的 FFP2 口罩的 PPE。团队和干预顺序是随机的。我们使用 d2 测试测量注意力集中性能的变化,使用九孔钉测试(NHPT)测量灵巧性。我们比较了三种条件下的结果。对于主要结果,非劣效性边界设定为 20 分。
共有 48 名 EMT 人员参与。每个场景后注意力表现都明显更好,组间无差异:d2 转移控制与带阀-8.3(95%CI-19.4 至 2.7)分;对照与无阀-8.5(-19.7 至 2.7)分;带阀与无阀 0.1(-11.1 至 11.3)分。NHPT 也得出了类似的结果:+0.3(-0.7 至 1.4),-0.4(-1.4 至 0.7),0.7(-0.4 至 1.8)s。
进行 BLS 时注意力会提高。佩戴 PPE,包括 FFP2 口罩,不会降低注意力和灵巧性。应基于低门槛使用 PPE。