Department of Agriculture (AGRARIA), University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Department of Agriculture (AGRARIA), University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:157229. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157229. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Circular economy (CE) is claimed to be a promising pathway to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but a reliable metric is needed to validate closed-loop strategies by measuring sustainability performances together with the degree of circularity. A significant contribution is offered by Life Cycle (LC) scholars in terms of methodological advances and operational tools for different sectors, also those more complex such as the agro-industrial systems that encompass biological and anthropogenic variables at different scales. However, to date, LC methodologies have not yet answered how to model the complexity of circular pathways. LC evaluations are often modelled for cradle-to-grave analyses, while a circularity evaluation would require an extension of the system boundaries to more interconnected life cycles, orienting towards a cradle-to-cradle perspective. This research gap led us to propose a multi-cycle approach with expanded assessment boundaries, including co-products, into a cradle-to-cradle perspective, in an attempt to internalize circularity impacts. The customized LC framework here proposed is based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), the Environmental Life Cycle Costing (ELCC) in terms of internal and external costs, and the Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) in terms of Psychosocial Risk Factor (PRF) impact pathway. The model is designed to be applied to the olive-oil sector, which commonly causes significant impacts by generating many by-products whose management is often problematic. Results are expected to show that the customized LC framework proposed can better highlight the environmental and socioeconomic performances of the system of cycles, allowing CE to deliver its promises of sustainability, as the circularity of materials per se is a means, not an end in itself.
循环经济(CE)被认为是实现可持续发展目标(SDGs)的有前途的途径,但需要一种可靠的指标来验证闭环策略,方法是通过测量可持续性绩效和循环度来衡量循环度。生命周期(LC)学者在不同领域的方法进步和运营工具方面做出了重要贡献,包括那些更复杂的领域,如农业产业系统,该系统在不同尺度上包含生物和人为变量。然而,迄今为止,LC 方法尚未回答如何模拟循环途径的复杂性。LC 评估通常针对摇篮到坟墓的分析进行建模,而循环性评估将需要将系统边界扩展到更多相互关联的生命周期,以朝向摇篮到摇篮的视角。这一研究空白促使我们提出了一种多周期方法,将扩展的评估边界包括副产品纳入摇篮到摇篮的视角,以尝试纳入循环性影响。这里提出的定制 LC 框架基于生命周期评估(LCA)、内部和外部成本的环境生命周期成本核算(ELCC)以及心理社会风险因素(PRF)影响途径的社会生命周期评估(SLCA)。该模型旨在应用于橄榄油行业,该行业通常会通过产生许多管理通常存在问题的副产品而造成重大影响。预计结果将表明,所提出的定制 LC 框架可以更好地突出循环系统的环境和社会经济绩效,允许 CE 实现其可持续性的承诺,因为材料的循环本身是一种手段,而不是目的本身。