Suppr超能文献

激励措施对提高健康促进计划覆盖范围的效果-系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of incentives to improve the reach of health promotion programs- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Department of Health and Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2022 Sep;162:107141. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107141. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Abstract

The reach (i.e., enrollment, engagement, and retention) of health promotion evidence-based programs (EBPs) at the participant level has been challenging. Incentives based on behavioral economics may be used to improve EBP reach. We aimed to systematically review and synthesize the evidence of the effectiveness of incentives as a dissemination strategy to increase EBP reach. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane Review and Cochrane CENTRAL for articles published between January 2000 and March 2020 to identify incentive strategies used to increase program reach among health promotion EBPs. Inclusion criteria included studies published in English, experimental or quasi-experimental designs, comparison of incentive to non-incentive or control strategies, and reported on reach (n = 35 health promotion studies). Monetary incentives using cash and a fixed schedule of reinforcement were the most used incentive schemes (71%). Incentives alone or combined with other strategies as a multicomponent approach were effective in improving program enrollment, engagement, and retention. Specifically, incentive strategies were associated with higher odds of program enrollment (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-4.24; n = 10) and retention (OR, 2.54, 95% CI, 1.34-4.85; n = 9) with considerable heterogeneity (I = 94% and 91%, respectively). Incentives are a promising individual-level dissemination strategy to improve the reach of health promotion EBPs. However, understanding the optimal amount, type, frequency, and target of incentives, and how incentives fit in a multicomponent approach in different contexts requires further research.

摘要

健康促进循证实践(EBP)在参与者层面的实施范围(即参与率、参与度和保留率)一直具有挑战性。基于行为经济学的激励措施可能被用于提高 EBP 的实施范围。我们旨在系统地回顾和综合激励措施作为一种传播策略来增加 EBP 实施范围的有效性证据。我们在 PubMed、SCOPUS、EMBASE、Cochrane 评价和 Cochrane 中心数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定用于增加健康促进 EBP 实施范围的激励策略的文章,检索时间为 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月。纳入标准包括发表于英文期刊、实验或准实验设计、比较激励与非激励或对照策略以及报告实施范围(n=35 项健康促进研究)的文章。使用现金和固定强化时间表的金钱激励是最常用的激励方案(71%)。单独使用激励措施或与其他策略结合使用作为多组分方法可有效提高项目的参与率、参与度和保留率。具体而言,激励策略与项目参与(优势比 [OR],2.78;95%置信区间 [CI],1.82-4.24;n=10)和保留(OR,2.54,95% CI,1.34-4.85;n=9)的可能性显著相关,但存在较大的异质性(分别为 I=94%和 91%)。激励措施是一种有前途的个体层面传播策略,可以提高健康促进 EBP 的实施范围。然而,要了解激励措施的最佳数量、类型、频率和目标,以及激励措施在不同背景下如何融入多组分方法,还需要进一步的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验