University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, 1000 N Jefferson Street, Albany, GA 31701, United States.
Instructional Technology Development Professional Specialist, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy South, Rm. 120D, Athens, GA 30602, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jun;14(6):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
A case-based learning "Choose Your Own Adventure" (CBL-CYOA) activity was designed to support students in learning to identify drug-related problems and make clinical decisions related to drug therapy management. The purpose of this study was to describe student pharmacists' experiences in order to understand, from their perspective, which design features of the CBL-CYOA activity were valued as useful for developing clinical decision-making skills in an Applied Pharmacy Practice I course. However, several limitations with various features of study design minimized the usefulness of results.
In retrospect, methodological limitations with both the survey and focus group designs negatively impacted the interpretation of results in this study.
Attention to thoughtful survey development with better alignment to the purpose of the study and neutral questions may produce more useful results. Further, additional focus groups and a purposeful sampling strategy may add to increasing the credibility of the findings in this study.
Overall, formative studies like this one have the potential to produce insights into how innovative instructional designs operate in real-world contexts. They also have the capacity to output results that provide an evidence base for refining and improving those designs. We hope that our reflections in this paper may be useful to other educators and researchers working to plan similar projects in the future.
设计了基于案例的学习“选择你自己的冒险”(CBL-CYOA)活动,以支持学生学习识别与药物相关的问题,并做出与药物治疗管理相关的临床决策。本研究的目的是描述药剂学生的经验,以便从他们的角度了解 CBL-CYOA 活动的哪些设计特点被认为对在应用药学实践 I 课程中发展临床决策技能有用。然而,研究设计的几个特征存在各种局限性,降低了结果的有用性。
回顾过去,调查和焦点小组设计的方法学局限性对本研究结果的解释产生了负面影响。
关注精心设计的调查,使其与研究目的更好地保持一致,并使用中性问题,可能会产生更有用的结果。此外,增加焦点小组和有针对性的抽样策略可能有助于增加本研究结果的可信度。
总的来说,像这样的形成性研究有可能深入了解创新教学设计在现实环境中是如何运作的。它们还能够输出结果,为改进和完善这些设计提供证据基础。我们希望本文中的反思能对未来从事类似项目的其他教育工作者和研究人员有所帮助。