• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reimagining Pharmacy Education through the Lens of a Choose Your Own Adventure Activity-A Qualitative Evaluation.通过“选择你自己的冒险”活动视角重新构想药学教育——一项定性评估
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;9(3):151. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030151.
2
Enhancing Student Knowledge of Diabetes through Virtual Choose Your Own Adventure Patient Case Format.通过虚拟“选择你自己的冒险”患者病例形式增强学生对糖尿病的了解。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;9(2):87. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9020087.
3
A meta-narrative review of choose-your-own-adventure style patient case activities in pharmacy education.药学教育中选择式冒险风格患者病例活动的元叙事回顾。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Jun;16(6):484-495. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Choose Your Own Adventure and Traditional Linear Case Formats in Radiology Small Group Teaching.选择自己的冒险与传统线性病例格式在放射科小组教学中的比较评估。
Acad Radiol. 2022 May;29 Suppl 5:S82-S88. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.022. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
5
Implementing a choose your own adventure activity to improve insulin decision making.开展一项“选择你自己的冒险”活动以改善胰岛素决策。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Feb;15(2):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Lessons learned from a formative study evaluating student pharmacists' experience with a case-based learning "choose your own adventure" activity.从一项形成性研究中汲取的经验教训,该研究评估了学生药剂师在基于案例的学习“选择自己的冒险”活动中的体验。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Jun;14(6):790-797. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
Effect of Choose-Your-Own-Adventure (CYOA) Activities on Pharmacy Student Knowledge.自主选择式活动对药学学生知识的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Oct;88(10):101284. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101284. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Ready Patient One: How to Turn an In-Person Critical Care Simulation Scenario Into an Online Serious Game.一号就绪患者:如何将面对面的重症护理模拟场景转化为在线严肃游戏。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 5;13(9):e17746. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17746. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Teaching Deprescribing and Combating Polypharmacy in the Pharmacy Curriculum: Educational Recommendations from Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups.药学课程中减药及应对多重用药的教学:焦点小组主题分析的教育建议
Clin Pract. 2023 Mar 14;13(2):442-453. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13020040.

引用本文的文献

1
Student Use of Digital Patient Cases May Improve Performance in a Pharmacy Cardiovascular Therapeutics Course.学生使用数字患者案例可能会提高药学心血管治疗课程的成绩。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;13(2):31. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13020031.
2
An innovative approach to teaching depression and anxiety medication management: Virtual choose your own adventure, psychiatry edition.一种教授抑郁症和焦虑症药物管理的创新方法:虚拟“选择你自己的冒险”,精神病学版。
Ment Health Clin. 2022 Aug 23;12(4):225-231. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2022.08.225. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Empathy in Health and Social Care Professionals.同理心在健康与社会护理专业人员中的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 30;8(1):26. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010026.
2
Gamification in Action: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Medical Educators.游戏化实践:医学教育者的理论与实践考量
Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002183.
3
Game on: The gamification of the pharmacy classroom.游戏开始:药学课堂的游戏化
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jan-Feb;9(1):155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.046. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
Insights, Pearls, and Guidance on Successfully Producing and Publishing Educational Research.关于成功开展和发表教育研究的见解、要点及指南。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Jun 25;80(5):75. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80575.
5
Educational Games as a Teaching Tool in Pharmacy Curriculum.教育游戏作为药学课程中的一种教学工具
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):59. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79459.
6
Are Serious Games a Good Strategy for Pharmacy Education?严肃游戏是药学教育的好策略吗?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):47. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79447.
7
Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom.翻转卫星课堂中药学学生的参与度、表现和认知。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Nov 12;77(9):196. doi: 10.5688/ajpe779196.
8
Analyzing focus group interviews.分析焦点小组访谈。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;33(5):478-81. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200609000-00004.
9
Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research.定性研究中的反思性方法。
Nurse Res. 2006;13(3):7-21. doi: 10.7748/nr2006.04.13.3.7.c5975.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

通过“选择你自己的冒险”活动视角重新构想药学教育——一项定性评估

Reimagining Pharmacy Education through the Lens of a Choose Your Own Adventure Activity-A Qualitative Evaluation.

作者信息

Scott Devin, Cernasev Alina, Kiles Tyler Marie

机构信息

Teaching and Learning Center, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 301 S Perimeter Park Dr., Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37211, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;9(3):151. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030151.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy9030151
PMID:34564558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8482149/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful pharmacy curricula expose students to a variety of teaching and assessment methods to prepare students for clinical practice. However, development of clinical decision-making skills is often challenging for learners. To meet this need, the Choose Your Own Adventure (CYOA) Patient Case Format was developed to enhance traditional paper patient cases by integrating problem-based and case-based learning to improve pharmacy student learning. The objectives of this evaluation were to qualitatively evaluate the CYOA case format. The qualitative assessment of the student pharmacist's learning experience utilizing this novel patient case format was used to formulate a template for extrapolation to other disease states.

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted with second year Pharm.D. students enrolled at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) College of Pharmacy. The focus groups were conducted in Fall 2020, beginning the week after they were exposed to the CYOA case format. The corpus of data was analyzed thematically to identify themes using inductive coding. To establish the validity of this evaluation, the team met to assess the consistency of the data reduction methods and guard against methodological issues that could influence and affect coding decisions.

RESULTS

Participants were recruited until thematic saturation was achieved. Out of 25 participants, 23 participants provided demographic information, with 74% identifying as female. Thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) (2) Empowering Pharmacy Students through Groupwork: and (3) Meeting the Need for Real-Life Scenarios: Conclusions: The data highlight that there are numerous advantages of adopting the CYOA format for delivering applied pharmacotherapy content. The CYOA format presents students with a realistic scenario that is fun and engaging and challenges students to justify their decisions regarding patient care in a structured group environment.

摘要

背景

成功的药学课程会让学生接触到多种教学和评估方法,为学生的临床实践做好准备。然而,临床决策技能的培养对学习者来说往往具有挑战性。为满足这一需求,开发了“选择你自己的冒险”(CYOA)患者病例形式,通过整合基于问题的学习和基于案例的学习来改进传统纸质患者病例,以提高药学专业学生的学习效果。本次评估的目的是对CYOA病例形式进行定性评估。利用这种新颖的患者病例形式对学生药剂师的学习体验进行定性评估,以制定一个可推广到其他疾病状态的模板。

方法

对田纳西大学健康科学中心(UTHSC)药学院的二年级药学博士学生进行了焦点小组访谈。焦点小组访谈于2020年秋季进行,在他们接触CYOA病例形式后的第一周开始。对数据语料库进行主题分析,使用归纳编码来识别主题。为了确定本次评估的有效性,团队开会评估数据简化方法的一致性,并防范可能影响编码决策的方法学问题。

结果

持续招募参与者,直至达到主题饱和。在25名参与者中,23名参与者提供了人口统计学信息,其中74%为女性。主题分析确定了三个主题:(1)[此处原文缺失该主题内容](2)通过小组合作赋予药学专业学生权力:[此处原文缺失该主题具体内容](3)满足对现实生活场景的需求:[此处原文缺失该主题具体内容]结论:数据表明,采用CYOA形式来传授应用药物治疗内容有诸多优点。CYOA形式为学生呈现了一个现实的场景,既有趣又引人入胜,并且在结构化的小组环境中挑战学生为其关于患者护理的决策提供正当理由。