• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童性虐待(CSA)多模式治疗方案的五年成本节约:社会投资回报研究。

Five year cost savings of a multimodal treatment program for child sexual abuse (CSA): a social return on investment study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, 1E7.17 Mackenzie Centre, 8114 -112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.

Be Brave Ranch, Centre for Treatment of Child Sexual Abuse, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08267-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08267-w
PMID:35810283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9270795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialized mental health services for the treatment of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) are generally expensive and labour intensive. They require a trauma-informed approach that may involve multiple services and therapeutic modalities, provided over the course of several months. That said, given the broad-ranging, long term negative sequelae of CSA, an evaluation of the cost-benefit analysis of treatment is clearly justified.

METHODS

We performed a Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis of data gathered as part of the treatment program at the Be Brave Ranch in Edmonton, Canada to determine the value-for-money of the services provided. We endeavoured to take a conservative, medium-term (5 year) perspective; this is in contrast to short term (1-2 year) effects, which may rapidly dissipate, or long term (15-20 year) effects, which are likely diffuse and difficult to measure. As such, our analysis was based on an average annual intake of 100 children/adolescents (60:40 split) and their families, followed over a five-year timeframe. Financial proxies were assigned to benefits not easily monetized, and six potential domains of cost savings were identified.

RESULTS

Our analyses suggest that each dollar spent in treatment results in an average cost savings of $11.60 (sensitivity analysis suggests range of 9.20-12.80). The largest value-for-money was identified as the domain of crisis prevention, via the avoidance of rare but costly events associated with the long term impacts of CSA. Somewhat surprisingly, savings related to the area of criminal justice were minimal, compared to other social domains analysed. Implications are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the cost effectiveness of the investment associated with specialized, evidence-based early interventions for CSA. These approaches alleviate severe, negative outcomes associated with CSA, resulting in both economic savings and social benefits. These findings rest upon a number of assumptions, and generalizability of these results is therefore limited to similar programs located in comparable areas. However, the SROI ratio achieved in this analysis, in excess of $11:1, supports the idea that, while costly, these services more than pay for themselves over time.

摘要

背景

专门的心理健康服务,用于治疗儿童性虐待(CSA),通常费用昂贵且劳动强度大。它们需要一种创伤知情的方法,可能涉及多种服务和治疗方式,需要在几个月的时间内提供。也就是说,鉴于 CSA 带来的广泛而长期的负面影响,对治疗的成本效益分析进行评估是合理的。

方法

我们对加拿大埃德蒙顿勇敢牧场(Be Brave Ranch)治疗项目中收集的数据进行了社会投资回报率(SROI)分析,以确定所提供服务的物有所值。我们试图采取保守的、中期(5 年)视角;这与短期(1-2 年)效果形成对比,短期效果可能会迅速消散,或者长期(15-20 年)效果可能会扩散且难以衡量。因此,我们的分析基于每年平均有 100 名儿童/青少年(60:40 比例)及其家庭的摄入量,并在五年的时间内进行跟踪。对不易货币化的收益分配了财务代理,并确定了六个潜在的成本节约领域。

结果

我们的分析表明,治疗每花费 1 美元,平均可节省 11.60 美元(敏感性分析表明范围在 9.20-12.80 美元之间)。最具成本效益的是危机预防领域,通过避免与 CSA 长期影响相关的罕见但昂贵的事件。令人惊讶的是,与分析的其他社会领域相比,与刑事司法相关的节省微不足道。讨论了影响。

结论

我们的结果支持与 CSA 的专门的、基于证据的早期干预相关的投资的成本效益。这些方法缓解了 CSA 带来的严重负面影响,从而带来了经济和社会效益。这些发现基于许多假设,因此这些结果的普遍性仅限于类似的位于类似地区的项目。然而,本分析中实现的 SROI 比率超过 11:1,支持这样的观点,即尽管费用高昂,但这些服务随着时间的推移会得到回报。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2e/9270795/ec1fbbb57f3b/12913_2022_8267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2e/9270795/85d05ca04876/12913_2022_8267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2e/9270795/ec1fbbb57f3b/12913_2022_8267_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2e/9270795/85d05ca04876/12913_2022_8267_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c2e/9270795/ec1fbbb57f3b/12913_2022_8267_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Five year cost savings of a multimodal treatment program for child sexual abuse (CSA): a social return on investment study.儿童性虐待(CSA)多模式治疗方案的五年成本节约:社会投资回报研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08267-w.
2
Social return on investment economic evaluation of supportive care for lung cancer patients in acute care settings in Australia.澳大利亚急性护理环境中支持性护理肺癌患者的社会投资回报经济评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08800-x.
3
Using cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment to evaluate the impact of social enterprise: Promises, implementation, and limitations.运用成本效益分析和社会投资回报率评估社会企业的影响:前景、实施与局限
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
5
Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.投资回报率:对美国公共资助计划生育项目的效益和成本节约情况进行更全面的评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):696-749. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12080. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
6
Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review.用于评估公共卫生干预措施性价比的社会投资回报率(SROI)方法:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 24;15:582. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1935-7.
7
Economic evaluation of treatments for children with severe behavioural problems.对患有严重行为问题儿童的治疗方法的经济评估。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2004 Dec;7(4):177-89.
8
Social value of a set of proposals for the ideal approach of multiple sclerosis within the Spanish National Health System: a social return on investment study.一套西班牙国家卫生系统内多发性硬化症理想治疗方法建议的社会价值:一项社会投资回报研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4946-8.
9
Social Return on Investment (SROI) of mental health related interventions-A scoping review.心理健康相关干预措施的社会投资回报率(SROI):范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;10:965148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965148. eCollection 2022.
10
SROI in the pay for success context: Are they at odds?
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Prevention Interventions for Child Sexual Exploitation or Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review.儿童性剥削或儿童性虐待预防干预措施的经济评估:系统评价
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jul;26(3):546-559. doi: 10.1177/15248380241284782. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The frequencies and disparities of adverse childhood experiences in the U.S.美国不良童年经历的频率和差异
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):1327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09411-z.
2
A Novel 2-week Intensive Multimodal Treatment Program for Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Survivors is Associated with Mental Health Benefits for Females aged 13-16.一项针对儿童性虐待(CSA)幸存者的新型为期两周的强化多模式治疗方案,对13至16岁女性的心理健康有益。
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;29(3):165-176. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
The social value of investing in public health across the life course: a systematic scoping review.
投资全生命周期公共卫生的社会价值:系统范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 1;20(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08685-7.
4
Child Sexual Abuse and Criminal Offending: Gender-Specific Effects and the Role of Abuse Characteristics and Other Adverse Outcomes.儿童性虐待与犯罪行为:基于性别差异的影响,以及虐待特征和其他不良后果的作用。
Child Maltreat. 2018 Nov;23(4):399-416. doi: 10.1177/1077559518785779. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
5
The economic burden of child sexual abuse in the United States.美国儿童性虐待的经济负担。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多种不良童年经历对健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Aug;2(8):e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Social Return on Investment: A New Approach to Understanding and Advocating for Value in Healthcare.社会投资回报率:一种理解和倡导医疗保健价值的新方法。
J Nurs Adm. 2017 Dec;47(12):623-628. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000557.
8
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.《健康与医疗领域成本效益分析的实施、方法学实践和报告推荐:第二版》。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
9
Psychological Distress and Revictimization Risk in Youth Victims of Sexual Abuse.性虐待青年受害者的心理困扰和再次受害风险。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 May;34(9):1930-1960. doi: 10.1177/0886260516658755. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
10
Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review.用于评估公共卫生干预措施性价比的社会投资回报率(SROI)方法:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 24;15:582. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1935-7.