Meysman Jasmine, Morreel Stefan, Lefevere Eva, Verhoeven Veronique, De Graeve Diana, Monsieurs Koenraad G, Philips Hilde
Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 Jul;63:101191. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101191. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
This process evaluation aims at identifying the facilitators and inhibitors that influenced the successful uptake of a nurse-led triage system streaming low-risk patients from an emergency department (ED) to the general practitioner (GP).
DESIGN & METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with ED nurses (n = 12), ED doctors (n = 6) from the ED of a Belgian general hospital and GPs (n = 5) affiliated with the adjacent GP cooperative (GPC). The process evaluation ran in parallel with the TRIAGE trial that started in March 2019 and ended 31st of December 2019. The first set of interviews was conducted in June 2019 and the second set in January 2020. Data were analysed based on grounded theory.
Through a deductive framework, facilitators and inhibitors could be identified on three levels: the organisational, group and individual level. Main inhibitors are the degree of risk aversion of individual nurses, possible language barriers during delivery of the triage advice and the non-adapted ED infrastructure. Training on both the use of the triage protocol and effective delivery of the triage advice, in combination with periodical feedback from the GPC were the most important facilitators.
Based on the process evaluation we can conclude that a consensus exists among stakeholders that the ED Nurses are considered ideally positioned to perform the triage of walk-in patients, although a certain degree of experience is necessary. Although the extended triage protocol and GPC referral increases the complexity and duration of triage and entails a higher workload for the triage nurses, ED nurses found it did lead to a lower (perceived) workload for the ED in general.
本过程评估旨在确定影响护士主导的分流系统成功应用的促进因素和阻碍因素,该系统将低风险患者从急诊科(ED)分流至全科医生(GP)处。
对比利时一家综合医院急诊科的急诊护士(n = 12)、急诊医生(n = 6)以及与相邻全科医生合作组织(GPC)相关联的全科医生(n = 5)进行半结构化访谈。过程评估与2019年3月开始并于2019年12月31日结束的分流试验并行开展。第一轮访谈于2019年6月进行,第二轮于2020年1月进行。基于扎根理论对数据进行分析。
通过一个演绎框架,可在三个层面确定促进因素和阻碍因素:组织层面、团队层面和个人层面。主要阻碍因素包括个别护士的风险厌恶程度、分流建议传达过程中可能存在的语言障碍以及未适配的急诊科基础设施。关于分流方案使用和分流建议有效传达的培训,以及来自GPC的定期反馈是最重要的促进因素。
基于过程评估,我们可以得出结论,利益相关者之间存在共识,即尽管需要一定程度的经验,但急诊护士被认为最适合对非预约患者进行分流。尽管扩展的分流方案和GPC转诊增加了分流的复杂性和时长,给分流护士带来了更高的工作量,但急诊护士发现这总体上确实降低了急诊科(感知到的)工作量。