• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士主导分诊在急诊科的成本效果,对低危患者建议咨询相邻的全科医生合作,一项整群随机试验。

Cost effects of nurse led triage at an emergency department with the advice to consult the adjacent general practice cooperative for low-risk patients, a cluster randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Family and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, Antwerp 2610, Belgium.

Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, Antwerp 2000, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.002
PMID:35963797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the TRIAGE trial, emergency nurses diverted 13.3% of patients with low-risk complaints from a Belgian emergency department (ED) to the adjacent general practitioner cooperative (GPC). We examined the effects of this diversion on the total cost, insurance costs and patient costs, as charged on the invoice. Changes in the cost composition and the direct impact on revenues of both locations were examined as a secondary objective.

METHODS

The differences in costs between intervention and control weekends were tested with two-sample t-tests and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) tests. For the main outcomes an additional generalised linear model was created. Proportions of patients charged with certain costs were examined using Pearson's chi-square tests. Average revenues per weekend were compared using pooled t-tests.

RESULTS

During intervention weekends, total costs increased by 3% (€3.3). The costs decreased by 8% (€2.2) for patients and increased by 6% (€5.5) for insurance, mainly driven by differences in physician fees. More patients were charged a consultation fee only (25% vs. 19%, p-value<0.01). The GPC's revenues increased by 13% (p-value=0.06); no change was found for the ED's revenues.

CONCLUSION

The intervention reduced costs slightly for patients, while total costs and insurance costs slightly increased. When implementing triage systems with primary care involvement, the effects on the costs and revenues of the stakeholders should be monitored.

摘要

背景

在 TRIAGE 试验中,急诊护士将 13.3%的低风险投诉患者从比利时急诊部门 (ED) 分流到相邻的全科医生合作社 (GPC)。我们考察了这种分流对总费用、保险费用和患者费用的影响,这些费用均按发票收取。作为次要目标,还考察了成本构成的变化以及对两个地点收入的直接影响。

方法

使用两样本 t 检验和 Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) 检验检验干预周末和对照周末之间的成本差异。对于主要结局,还创建了一个广义线性模型。使用 Pearson's chi-square 检验检查收取特定费用的患者比例。使用 pooled t 检验比较每个周末的平均收入。

结果

在干预周末,总费用增加了 3%(€3.3)。患者费用减少了 8%(€2.2),而保险费用增加了 6%(€5.5),主要是由于医生费用的差异。更多的患者仅收取咨询费(25%比 19%,p 值<0.01)。GPC 的收入增加了 13%(p 值=0.06);ED 的收入没有变化。

结论

该干预措施略微降低了患者的成本,同时总费用和保险费用略有增加。在实施涉及初级保健的分诊系统时,应监测对利益相关者的成本和收入的影响。

相似文献

1
Cost effects of nurse led triage at an emergency department with the advice to consult the adjacent general practice cooperative for low-risk patients, a cluster randomised trial.护士主导分诊在急诊科的成本效果,对低危患者建议咨询相邻的全科医生合作,一项整群随机试验。
Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Non-compliance with a nurse's advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial.不遵守护士建议就诊初级保健提供者:TRIAGE 试验的探索性二次分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07904-8.
3
Triaging and referring in adjacent general and emergency departments (the TRIAGE trial): A cluster randomised controlled trial.分诊和转诊相邻综合和急诊部门(TRIAGE 试验):一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 3;16(11):e0258561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258561. eCollection 2021.
4
Triaging and referring in adjacent general and emergency departments (the TRIAGE-trial): A process evaluation of medical staff experiences in a nurse-led triage system.相邻普通科室与急诊科的分诊及转诊(TRIAGE试验):对护士主导分诊系统中医务人员体验的过程评估
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 Jul;63:101191. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101191. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Differences in emergency nurse triage between a simulated setting and the real world, post hoc analysis of a cluster randomised trial.模拟环境与真实世界中急诊护士分诊的差异:一项集群随机试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 1;12(7):e059173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059173.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage for managing same-day consultation requests in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing general practitioner-led and nurse-led management systems with usual care (the ESTEEM trial).电话分诊在全科医疗中处理当日会诊请求的临床有效性和成本效益:一项整群随机对照试验,比较全科医生主导和护士主导的管理系统与常规护理(ESTEEM试验)。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(13):1-212, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19130.
7
Acceptability of emergency department triage nurse's advice for patients to attend general practice: A cross-sectional survey.急诊科分诊护士建议患者就诊全科医生的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Jun;34(3):376-384. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13903. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的基层医疗专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4.
9
Referral of nonurgent children from the emergency department to general practice: compliance and cost savings.将非紧急儿科患者从急诊科转至全科医生处:依从性和成本节约。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(1):14-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834727d4.
10
Israeli emergency department nurses' attitudes to an extension of their role and powers.以色列急诊部门护士对扩大其角色和权力的态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jan;23(1-2):261-7. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12405. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining Urogynaecology Services: The Impact of Nurse-Physiotherapist Triage Clinics on Reducing Delays and Improving Patient Care.重新定义泌尿妇科服务:护士-物理治疗师分诊诊所对减少延误和改善患者护理的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06259-y.
2
The need for a broad perspective when assessing value-for-money for out-of-hours primary care.评估非工作时间初级保健的性价比时需要有广阔的视角。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000318.