• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受肱骨近端骨折手术治疗患者的再入院率、再次手术率和非家庭出院率。

Readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge rates in patients receiving surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures.

作者信息

Ling Kenny, Kashanchi Kevin I, VanHelmond Taylor, Nazemi Alireza, Kim Matthew, Komatsu David E, Wang Edward D

机构信息

Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2022 Mar 7;6(4):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.008. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.008
PMID:35813141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9264000/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are generally surgically treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Diverse fracture patterns and a high prevalence in the elderly population make it difficult to establish objective guidelines for the decision to undergo surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge following ORIF, HA, and TSA for PHFs.

METHODS

Data on all patients who underwent ORIF, TSA, or HA for treatment of closed PHF between 2015 and 2017 were obtained by querying the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Rates of postoperative readmission, nonhome discharge, and reoperation within 30 days were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of readmission, nonhome discharge, and reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 2825 patients were included in this study: 1829 underwent ORIF, 707 underwent TSA, and 289 underwent HA. The significant predictors for readmission were having an American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 (odds ratio [OR] 1.95,  = .003) and being of dependent functional status (OR 3.15,  < .001). The significant predictors for reoperation were male sex (OR 2.41,  < .001) and dependent functional status (OR 2.92,  = .006). The significant predictors for nonhome discharge were age 66-80 years (OR 7.00,  < .001), age ≥ 81 years (OR 16.31,  < .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3 (OR 2.34,  < .001), dependent functional status (OR 2.48,  < .001), and inpatient status (OR 3.32,  < .001). TSA showed slightly higher rates of nonhome discharge than HA and ORIF.

CONCLUSION

Significant risk factors for readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge within 30 days following surgical treatment for PHF were identified. Additionally, TSA was significantly associated with nonhome discharge compared with HA and ORIF.

摘要

背景

肱骨近端骨折(PHF)通常采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)、半关节置换术(HA)或全肩关节置换术(TSA)进行手术治疗。多样的骨折类型以及老年人群中的高发病率使得制定手术治疗决策的客观指南变得困难。本研究的目的是调查与肱骨近端骨折行切开复位内固定术、半关节置换术和全肩关节置换术后再入院、再次手术及非家庭出院相关的危险因素。

方法

通过查询美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进数据库,获取2015年至2017年间所有因闭合性肱骨近端骨折接受切开复位内固定术、全肩关节置换术或半关节置换术治疗的患者的数据。收集术后30天内的再入院率、非家庭出院率和再次手术率。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定再入院、非家庭出院和再次手术的预测因素。

结果

本研究共纳入2825例患者:1829例行切开复位内固定术,707例行全肩关节置换术,289例行半关节置换术。再入院的显著预测因素为美国麻醉医师协会分级≥3级(比值比[OR]1.95,P = 0.003)和功能依赖状态(OR 3.15,P < 0.001)。再次手术的显著预测因素为男性(OR 2.41,P < 0.001)和功能依赖状态(OR 2.92,P = 0.006)。非家庭出院的显著预测因素为年龄66 - 80岁(OR 7.00,P < 0.001)、年龄≥81岁(OR 16.31,P < 0.001)、美国麻醉医师协会分级≥3级(OR 2.34,P < 0.001)、功能依赖状态(OR 2.48,P < 0.001)和住院状态(OR 3.32,P < 0.001)。全肩关节置换术的非家庭出院率略高于半关节置换术和切开复位内固定术。

结论

确定了肱骨近端骨折手术治疗后30天内再入院、再次手术和非家庭出院的显著危险因素。此外,与半关节置换术和切开复位内固定术相比,全肩关节置换术与非家庭出院显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/9264000/41515ace5979/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/9264000/16da0706c0f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/9264000/41515ace5979/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/9264000/16da0706c0f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab1d/9264000/41515ace5979/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge rates in patients receiving surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures.接受肱骨近端骨折手术治疗患者的再入院率、再次手术率和非家庭出院率。
JSES Int. 2022 Mar 7;6(4):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.008. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Short-term Complications for Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery Have Decreased: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.肱骨近端骨折手术的短期并发症减少:国家手术质量改进计划数据库分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2122-2133. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002391. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Implant Survival After Inpatient Surgical Management of Geriatric Proximal Humerus Fractures.老年肱骨近端骨折住院手术治疗后的短期疗效及长期植入物存活率
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2023 Aug 7;7:24715492231192068. doi: 10.1177/24715492231192068. eCollection 2023.
4
Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肱骨近端骨折的急性外科治疗:切开复位内固定术与人工半肩关节置换术和反式肩关节置换术的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S32-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.012. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ?影响肱骨近端骨折手术治疗的因素:肩肘外科医生和创伤外科医生有区别吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):e259-e269. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
6
Increasing Use of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients.老年患者近端肱骨骨折中反向全肩关节置换术的使用增加。
Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e982-e989. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-01. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Open reduction internal fixation has fewer short-term complications than shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.对于肱骨近端骨折,切开复位内固定术的短期并发症比肩关节置换术少。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):624-631.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of non-home discharge following surgical management of proximal humerus fractures.肱骨近端骨折手术治疗后非回家出院的发生率、危险因素及临床影响。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Dec;11(6):430-439. doi: 10.1177/1758573218809505. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures is associated with decreased 1-year mortality in patients aged 65 years and older: a retrospective study of Medicare patients.老年(≥65 岁)移位性肱骨近端骨折的外科治疗与 1 年死亡率降低相关:一项 Medicare 患者的回顾性研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):1962-1971. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.036. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
10
Total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture is associated with increased hospital charges despite a shorter length of stay.尽管住院时间较短,但肱骨近端骨折的全肩关节置换术会导致住院费用增加。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmission and Reoperation Following Clavicle Open Reduction Internal Fixation.锁骨切开复位内固定术后30天再入院及再次手术的危险因素
Cureus. 2024 Dec 30;16(12):e76632. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76632. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Factors affecting hospital admission, hospital length of stay and new discharge destination post proximal humeral fracture: a retrospective audit.影响肱骨近端骨折后住院、住院时间和新出院目的地的因素:回顾性审计。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04928-z.
3
Six-Item Modified Frailty Index independently predicts complications following total shoulder arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Mortality and Readmission After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty for Fracture.肩部半关节置换术治疗骨折后死亡和再入院的危险因素
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2019 Apr 23;3:2471549219840441. doi: 10.1177/2471549219840441. eCollection 2019.
2
The Cost-Effectiveness of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.老年肱骨近端骨折患者行反式全肩关节置换术与切开复位内固定术的成本效果比较。
Iowa Orthop J. 2020;40(2):20-29.
3
Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of non-home discharge following surgical management of proximal humerus fractures.
六项改良衰弱指数可独立预测全肩关节置换术后的并发症。
JSES Int. 2023 Sep 14;8(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.010. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肱骨近端骨折的医疗治疗方法的比较疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07053-x.
肱骨近端骨折手术治疗后非回家出院的发生率、危险因素及临床影响。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Dec;11(6):430-439. doi: 10.1177/1758573218809505. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
4
Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肱骨近端骨折的急性外科治疗:切开复位内固定术与人工半肩关节置换术和反式肩关节置换术的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S32-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.012. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
Do 30-Day Reoperation Rates Adequately Measure Quality in Orthopedic Surgery?30 天再手术率能充分衡量骨科手术质量吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Feb;46(2):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
A higher reoperation rate following arthroplasty for failed fixation primary arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective population-based study.翻修术后再手术率较高:初次关节置换术治疗肱骨近端骨折失败后的治疗选择:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Oct;101-B(10):1272-1279. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2019-0142.R2.
7
Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states.三大州肱骨近端骨折治疗后的再入院率、翻修率和死亡率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Sep 11;20(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2812-9.
8
Treatment of the surgical neck fracture of the humerus with a novel external fixator in the elderly with osteoporosis: biomechanical analysis.新型外固定器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨外科颈骨折:生物力学分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 15;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2599-8.
9
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.反式全肩关节置换术
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Feb 28;3(2):58-69. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170044. eCollection 2018 Feb.
10
Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management in the Elderly Patient.肱骨近端骨折:老年患者的评估与管理
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Jan 25;9:2151458517750516. doi: 10.1177/2151458517750516. eCollection 2018.