Waters Renée C, Gould Elizabeth
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jun 23;16:860847. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.860847. eCollection 2022.
It is now well-established that early life adversity (ELA) predisposes individuals to develop several neuropsychiatric conditions, including anxiety disorders, and major depressive disorder. However, ELA is a very broad term, encompassing multiple types of negative childhood experiences, including physical, sexual and emotional abuse, physical and emotional neglect, as well as trauma associated with chronic illness, family separation, natural disasters, accidents, and witnessing a violent crime. Emerging literature suggests that in humans, different types of adverse experiences are more or less likely to produce susceptibilities to certain conditions that involve affective dysfunction. To investigate the driving mechanisms underlying the connection between experience and subsequent disease, neuroscientists have developed several rodent models of ELA, including pain exposure, maternal deprivation, and limited resources. These studies have also shown that different types of ELA paradigms produce different but somewhat overlapping behavioral phenotypes. In this review, we first investigate the types of ELA that may be driving different neuropsychiatric outcomes and brain changes in humans. We next evaluate whether rodent models of ELA can provide translationally relevant information regarding links between specific types of experience and changes in neural circuits underlying dysfunction.
现在已经充分证实,早年生活逆境(ELA)使个体易患多种神经精神疾病,包括焦虑症和重度抑郁症。然而,ELA是一个非常宽泛的术语,涵盖多种类型的童年负面经历,包括身体虐待、性虐待和情感虐待、身体和情感忽视,以及与慢性病、家庭分离、自然灾害、事故和目睹暴力犯罪相关的创伤。新出现的文献表明,在人类中,不同类型的不良经历或多或少会使人易患某些涉及情感功能障碍的疾病。为了研究经历与后续疾病之间联系的驱动机制,神经科学家已经开发了几种ELA的啮齿动物模型,包括疼痛暴露、母婴分离和资源受限。这些研究还表明,不同类型的ELA范式会产生不同但有所重叠的行为表型。在这篇综述中,我们首先研究可能导致人类不同神经精神结果和大脑变化的ELA类型。接下来,我们评估ELA的啮齿动物模型是否能够提供与特定类型的经历和功能障碍背后神经回路变化之间的联系相关的可转化信息。