Yu Shijing, Mückschel Moritz, Hoffmann Sven, Bluschke Annet, Pscherer Charlotte, Beste Christian
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2023 Jan;60(1):e14146. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14146. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Actions can fail - even though this is well known, little is known about what distinguishes neurophysiological processes preceding errors and correct actions. In this study, relying on the Theory of Event Coding, we test the assumption that only specific aspects of information coded in EEG activity are relevant for understanding processes leading to response errors. We examined N = 69 healthy participants who performed a mental rotation task and combined temporal EEG signal decomposition with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and source localization analyses. We show that fractions of the EEG signal, primarily representing stimulus-response translation (event file) processes and motor response representations, are essential. Stimulus representations were less critical. The source localization results revealed widespread activity modulations in structures including the frontopolar, the middle and superior frontal, the anterior cingulate cortex, the cuneus, the inferior parietal cortex, and the ventral stream regions. These are associated with differential effects of the neural dynamics preceding correct/erroneous responses. The temporal-generalization MVPA showed that event file representations and representations of the motor response were already distinct 200 ms after stimulus presentation and this lasted till around 700 ms. The stability of this representational content was predictive for the magnitude of posterror slowing, which was particularly strong when there was no clear distinction between the neural activity profile of event file representations associated with a correct or an erroneous response. The study provides a detailed analysis of the dynamics leading to an error/correct response in connection to an overarching framework on action control.
行为可能会失败——尽管这是众所周知的,但对于区分错误行为和正确行为之前的神经生理过程的因素却知之甚少。在本研究中,我们依据事件编码理论,检验了这样一个假设:脑电图(EEG)活动中编码的信息只有特定方面与理解导致反应错误的过程相关。我们对69名健康参与者进行了研究,他们执行了心理旋转任务,并将EEG信号的时间分解与多变量模式分析(MVPA)以及源定位分析相结合。我们发现,EEG信号的各个部分至关重要,主要代表刺激-反应转换(事件文件)过程和运动反应表征。刺激表征的重要性较低。源定位结果显示,包括额极、额中回和额上回、前扣带回皮质、楔叶、顶下小叶皮质以及腹侧流区域在内的结构中存在广泛的活动调制。这些与正确/错误反应之前神经动力学的不同影响相关。时间泛化MVPA显示,事件文件表征和运动反应表现在刺激呈现后200毫秒就已经不同,并且这种差异一直持续到大约700毫秒。这种表征内容的稳定性可预测错误后反应减慢的程度,当与正确或错误反应相关的事件文件表征的神经活动特征没有明显区别时,这种预测尤为强烈。该研究结合动作控制的总体框架,对导致错误/正确反应的动态过程进行了详细分析。