Suppr超能文献

局限性肺切除术与立体定向体部放疗治疗早期肺癌的不良反应比较。

Adverse Events Following Limited Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Tisch Cancer Institute.

Division of General Internal Medicine, and.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Dec;19(12):2053-2061. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202203-275OC.

Abstract

Approximately a quarter of patients with early stage lung cancer are not medically fit for lobectomy. Limited resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have emerged as alternatives for these patients. Given the equipoise on the effectiveness of the two treatments, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) could have a significant impact on patients' decision-making and treatment outcomes. To compare the AE profile between SBRT versus limited resection. Data were derived from a prospective cohort of patients with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer who were deemed as high-risk for lobectomy recruited from five centers across the United States. Propensity scores and inverse probability weighting were used to compare the rates of 30- and 90-day AEs among patients treated with limited resection versus SBRT. Overall, 65% of 252 patients underwent SBRT. After adjusting for propensity scores, there was no significant difference in developing at least one AE comparing SBRT to limited resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.55 and OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.84-1.91 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). SBRT was associated with lower risk of infectious AEs than limited resection at 30 days (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.39) and 90 days posttreatment (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98). Additionally, SBRT was associated with persistently elevated risk of fatigue (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.34-4.54 at 30 days and OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.52-4.77 at 90 days, respectively), but significantly lower risks of respiratory AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.65 and OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.86 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). Though equivalent in developing at least one AE, we found that SBRT is associated with less toxicity than limited resection in terms of infectious and respiratory AEs but higher rates of fatigue that persisted up to 3 months posttreatment. This information, combined with data about oncologic effectiveness, can help patients' decision-making regarding these alternative therapies.

摘要

大约四分之一的早期肺癌患者不适合进行肺叶切除术。对于这些患者,有限切除术和立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)已成为替代方法。鉴于两种治疗方法的疗效相当,治疗相关的不良事件(AE)可能会对患者的决策和治疗结果产生重大影响。为了比较 SBRT 与有限切除术之间的 AE 谱。数据来自美国五个中心的前瞻性队列研究,该队列研究纳入了 I-IIA 期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者被认为肺叶切除术风险较高。使用倾向评分和逆概率加权来比较接受有限切除术与 SBRT 治疗的患者发生 30 天和 90 天 AE 的发生率。总体而言,252 例患者中有 65%接受了 SBRT。调整倾向评分后,与有限切除术相比,SBRT 组发生至少一种 AE 的几率没有显著差异(优势比 [OR]:1.00;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.65-1.55 和 OR:1.27;95% CI:0.84-1.91,分别为 30 天和 90 天)。与有限切除术相比,SBRT 组在 30 天(OR:0.05;95%CI:0.01-0.39)和 90 天(OR:0.41;95%CI:0.17-0.98)时发生感染性 AE 的风险较低。此外,SBRT 组在 30 天(OR:2.47;95%CI:1.34-4.54)和 90 天(OR:2.69;95%CI:1.52-4.77)时疲劳的风险持续升高,但发生呼吸系统 AE 的风险显著降低(OR:0.36;95%CI:0.20-0.65 和 OR:0.51;95%CI:0.31-0.86,分别为 30 天和 90 天)。虽然 SBRT 组和有限切除术组发生至少一种 AE 的几率相当,但我们发现,与有限切除术相比,SBRT 组在感染性和呼吸系统 AE 方面的毒性较低,但疲劳发生率较高,且在治疗后 3 个月内持续存在。这些信息,结合关于肿瘤学疗效的数据,可以帮助患者在这些替代疗法之间做出决策。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Survivorship Challenges and Supportive Care in Lung Cancer.肺癌的生存挑战与支持性护理
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1055/a-2649-9311.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验