Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Department of Statistics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 12;17(7):e0271278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271278. eCollection 2022.
The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul-Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence.
本研究旨在基于产后女性的分娩经历,通过项目反应理论构建一种衡量分娩期女性受虐待程度的工具提案。这是一项横断面研究,纳入了 2016 年在巴西南里奥格兰德州首府的两家妇产医院随机选择的 287 名分娩时未发生并发症的女性。产后约 30 天,这些女性通过面对面访谈回答了有关分娩经历(实施的实践和干预措施)的问题,并被询问是否感到受到医护人员的不尊重、虐待或羞辱。实践集被纳入项目反应理论模型以设计工具。在纳入模型的 36 个项目中,有 21 个项目专门针对进入分娩的女性,因此开发了两种工具。包含所有女性的 09 个项目的工具识别出 23.7%的女性在分娩期间受到虐待,而包含进入分娩的女性的 11 个项目的工具识别出 22%的女性受到虐待。区分度最高的项目是:分娩时没有陪伴(2.05;和 1.26)、不受欢迎(1.81;和 1.58)、没有安全感(1.59;和 1.70),适用于所有女性和进入分娩的女性。对于进入分娩的女性,没有陪伴(1.22;PE 0.88)和感觉不舒服提问和参与决策(1.20;PE 0.43)的项目也表现出更大的区分度。相比之下,当直接询问时,只有 12.5%的女性表示经历过不尊重或虐待,这表明有害实践往往不被视为暴力。标准化衡量分娩期女性受虐待程度可以更准确地估计其流行率,并有助于提出消除产科暴力的策略。