• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小脑经颅直流电刺激破坏皮质内运动回路的神经可塑性。

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.

机构信息

Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 12;17(7):e0271311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271311. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
PMID:35820111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9275832/
Abstract

While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 ± 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCSCB). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS1.5), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS4.5), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMSSham). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.

摘要

虽然先前使用经颅磁刺激 (TMS) 的研究表明小脑 (CB) 会影响初级运动皮层 (M1) 的神经可塑性反应,但不同的间接 (I) 波输入在介导这种相互作用中所起的作用尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估 CB 如何影响早期和晚期 I 波回路的神经可塑性。22 名年轻成年人(22 ± 2.7 岁)参加了 3 次会议,在这些会议中,在 CB 上应用阴极经颅直流电刺激 (tDCSCB) 的同时,在 M1 上应用 I 波周期性重复经颅磁刺激 (iTMS)。在每次会议中,iTMS 要么针对早期 I 波(1.5ms 间隔;iTMS1.5),要么针对晚期 I 波(4.5ms 间隔;iTMS4.5),要么没有影响(间隔变化;iTMSSham)。使用 TMS 协议测量皮质脊髓兴奋性(MEP1mV)和 CB-M1 连接强度(CBI),通过测量运动诱发电位 (MEP) 幅度来检查干预引起的变化。此外,我们使用短间隔内皮层易化 (SICF) 和低强度单脉冲 TMS 来索引 I 波活动,这些 TMS 应用于后前 (MEPPA) 和前后 (MEPAP) 电流方向。在两次主动 iTMS 会议后,MEP1mV、CBI 或 SICF 均无变化(均 P>0.05),这表明 tDCSCB 广泛破坏了通常在 iTMS 后观察到的兴奋性反应。然而,尽管干预后 MEPAP 也没有促进(P>0.05),但 MEPPA 在两次主动 iTMS 会议后都增强了(均 P<0.05)。这种电流方向之间的差异反应可能表明 CB 对 AP 敏感电路有选择性影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/7ff77780de45/pone.0271311.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/5406a58c3bd6/pone.0271311.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/b5065c76dda2/pone.0271311.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/e1646b120dea/pone.0271311.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/760770155067/pone.0271311.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/ec35df364395/pone.0271311.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/7ff77780de45/pone.0271311.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/5406a58c3bd6/pone.0271311.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/b5065c76dda2/pone.0271311.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/e1646b120dea/pone.0271311.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/760770155067/pone.0271311.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/ec35df364395/pone.0271311.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfbc/9275832/7ff77780de45/pone.0271311.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.小脑经颅直流电刺激破坏皮质内运动回路的神经可塑性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 12;17(7):e0271311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271311. eCollection 2022.
2
Modulation of I-Wave Generating Pathways With Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Study.经颅磁刺激-脑电图研究:重复成对脉冲经颅磁刺激对 I 波生成途径的调制。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jun;26(4):755-766. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.055. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
3
Effect of current direction and muscle activation on motor cortex neuroplasticity induced by repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.电流方向和肌肉激活对重复双脉冲经颅磁刺激诱导运动皮层神经可塑性的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Sep;58(5):3270-3285. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16099. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex differentially influences I-wave excitability in primary motor cortex of young and older adults.背侧运动前皮质的调制对年轻和老年成年人初级运动皮质 I 波兴奋性的影响不同。
J Physiol. 2023 Jul;601(14):2959-2974. doi: 10.1113/JP284204. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Modulation of Motor Cortex Plasticity by Repetitive Paired-Pulse TMS at Late I-Wave Intervals Is Influenced by Intracortical Excitability.在I波晚期间隔进行重复配对脉冲经颅磁刺激对运动皮层可塑性的调节受皮层内兴奋性影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):121. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010121.
6
Age-related changes in late I-waves influence motor cortex plasticity induction in older adults.年龄相关的晚期 I 波变化影响老年人运动皮层的可塑性诱导。
J Physiol. 2018 Jul;596(13):2597-2609. doi: 10.1113/JP274641. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?小脑-运动皮层连接:一个还是两个不同的网络?
J Neurosci. 2020 May 20;40(21):4230-4239. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2397-19.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
8
The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.双侧初级运动皮层和小脑同步阳极经颅直流电刺激对皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照研究。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Sep;227(7):2395-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02533-7. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Influence of waveform and current direction on short-interval intracortical facilitation: a paired-pulse TMS study.波形和电流方向对短程皮质内易化的影响:一项成对 TMS 研究。
Brain Stimul. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
Investigating the Effects of Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuomotor Training Using TMS-EEG.采用 TMS-EEG 研究重复成对脉冲经颅磁刺激对视动训练的影响。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Nov;37(6):1158-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01071-1. Epub 2024 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals in older adults.老年人中晚期I波间隔重复配对脉冲经颅磁刺激的神经调节作用
Exp Brain Res. 2025 May 6;243(6):140. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07060-5.
2
Investigating the Effects of Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuomotor Training Using TMS-EEG.采用 TMS-EEG 研究重复成对脉冲经颅磁刺激对视动训练的影响。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Nov;37(6):1158-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01071-1. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
3
Effect of current direction and muscle activation on motor cortex neuroplasticity induced by repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

本文引用的文献

1
Response bias reveals the role of interhemispheric inhibitory networks in movement preparation and execution.反应偏差揭示了大脑两半球抑制性网络在运动准备和执行中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jan 28;165:108120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108120. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Modulation of Motor Cortex Plasticity by Repetitive Paired-Pulse TMS at Late I-Wave Intervals Is Influenced by Intracortical Excitability.在I波晚期间隔进行重复配对脉冲经颅磁刺激对运动皮层可塑性的调节受皮层内兴奋性影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):121. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010121.
3
Preferential Activation of Unique Motor Cortical Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of the Physiological, Functional, and Clinical Evidence.
电流方向和肌肉激活对重复双脉冲经颅磁刺激诱导运动皮层神经可塑性的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Sep;58(5):3270-3285. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16099. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex differentially influences I-wave excitability in primary motor cortex of young and older adults.背侧运动前皮质的调制对年轻和老年成年人初级运动皮质 I 波兴奋性的影响不同。
J Physiol. 2023 Jul;601(14):2959-2974. doi: 10.1113/JP284204. Epub 2023 May 29.
经颅磁刺激的独特运动皮质网络的优先激活:生理、功能和临床证据的综述。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jul;24(5):813-828. doi: 10.1111/ner.13314. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Short-interval intracortical inhibition as a function of inter-stimulus interval: Three methods compared.短间隔皮质内抑制作为刺激间隔的函数:三种方法比较。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
Characterising the influence of cerebellum on the neuroplastic modulation of intracortical motor circuits.描述小脑对大脑皮质内运动回路神经重塑调节的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0236005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236005. eCollection 2020.
6
Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?小脑-运动皮层连接:一个还是两个不同的网络?
J Neurosci. 2020 May 20;40(21):4230-4239. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2397-19.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: The role of coil type from distinct manufacturers.小脑颅外磁刺激:不同制造商的线圈类型的作用。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):153-156. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation.小脑经颅直流电刺激对人类小脑-大脑抑制的影响:系统评价。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):1177-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Comparison between adaptive and fixed stimulus paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) in normal subjects.正常受试者中自适应与固定刺激配对脉冲经颅磁刺激(ppTMS)的比较。
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017 Apr 10;2:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2017.04.001. eCollection 2017.
10
Involvement of different neuronal components in the induction of cortical plasticity with associative stimulation.不同神经元成分在联合刺激诱导皮质可塑性中的作用。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan-Feb;12(1):84-86. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Sep 5.