• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝静脉阻断与联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术治疗结直肠肝转移:早期和晚期动力学生长速率以及围手术期和肿瘤学结局的比较。

Liver venous deprivation versus associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases: a comparison of early and late kinetic growth rates, and perioperative and oncological outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.

Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug;43:101812. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101812. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101812
PMID:35820263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different techniques have been developed to optimize the Future Liver Remnant (FLR). Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) have shown the higher hypertrophy rates, but their place in clinical practice is still debated.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures for CRLM performed between December 2015 and December 2019 were included. This retrospective study evaluated kinetic growth rates (KGR) as primary outcome, and perioperative and oncological outcomes as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients underwent LVD before surgery, whereas 15 underwent ALPPS. On early evaluation (7 vs 9 days, respectively), KGR did not differ between ALPPS and LVD cohort (0.8% per day vs 0.3% per day, p = 0.70; 23 cc/day vs 26 cc/day, p = 0.31). Late evaluation (21 vs 9 days) showed a KGR significantly decreased in the LVD group (0.6% per day vs 0.2% per day, p = 0.21; 20 cc/day vs 10 cc/day p = 0.02). Mean FLR-V increase was comparable in the two groups (60% vs 49%, p 0.32). Successful resection rate was 100% and 94% in LVD and ALPPS group, respectively. The hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and severe complications rate (p = 0.05) were lower after LVD. One and 3-years overall survival (OS) were 72,7% and 27,4% in the ALPSS group, versus 81,3% and 54,7% in LVD group (p = 0.10). The Median DFS was comparable between both techniques (6.1 months and 5.9 respectively, p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

LVD and ALPPS shows similar KGR during the early period following preparation as well as similar survival outcomes. Hospital stay and severe complications are lower after LVD.

摘要

背景

已经开发出不同的技术来优化未来肝残留(FLR)。联合肝脏分割和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)和肝静脉阻断(LVD)显示出更高的肝再生率,但它们在临床实践中的地位仍存在争议。

方法

纳入 2015 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月期间进行的 32 例连续的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者接受 ALPPS 和 LVD 治疗。本回顾性研究评估了动力学生长率(KGR)作为主要结局,以及围手术期和肿瘤学结局作为次要结局。

结果

共有 17 例患者在术前接受了 LVD,而 15 例患者接受了 ALPPS。在早期评估(分别为 7 天和 9 天)时,ALPPS 和 LVD 组的 KGR 没有差异(分别为 0.8%/天和 0.3%/天,p=0.70;分别为 23cc/天和 26cc/天,p=0.31)。晚期评估(21 天和 9 天)显示 LVD 组的 KGR 显著下降(分别为 0.6%/天和 0.2%/天,p=0.21;分别为 20cc/天和 10cc/天,p=0.02)。两组的 FLR-V 增加均值相似(分别为 60%和 49%,p=0.32)。LVD 和 ALPPS 组的成功切除率分别为 100%和 94%。LVD 后住院时间(p<0.0001)和严重并发症发生率(p=0.05)较低。ALPSS 组的 1 年和 3 年总生存率(OS)分别为 72.7%和 27.4%,LVD 组分别为 81.3%和 54.7%(p=0.10)。两种技术的中位 DFS 相似(分别为 6.1 个月和 5.9 个月,p=0.66)。

结论

LVD 和 ALPPS 在准备后的早期阶段显示出相似的 KGR 和相似的生存结果。LVD 后住院时间和严重并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Liver venous deprivation versus associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases: a comparison of early and late kinetic growth rates, and perioperative and oncological outcomes.肝静脉阻断与联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术治疗结直肠肝转移:早期和晚期动力学生长速率以及围手术期和肿瘤学结局的比较。
Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug;43:101812. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101812. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Liver Venous Deprivation or Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy?: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.肝静脉阻断或联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分阶段肝切除术?:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Nov 1;274(5):874-880. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005121.
3
Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.同期门静脉和肝静脉栓塞术优于门静脉栓塞术或 ALPPS 用于大肝切除术前未来肝残存量的代偿性增生:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023 Jun;22(3):221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Liver Venous Deprivation Versus Portal Vein Embolization Before Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes.肝静脉阻断与门静脉栓塞在结直肠癌肝转移的大宗肝切除术前的应用:短期和中期结果的回顾性比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):296-305. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05551-2. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Impact of split completeness on future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma: Complete-ALPPS versus partial-ALPPS.在肝细胞癌的联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)中,分割完整性对未来肝剩余体积增大的影响:完全性ALPPS与部分性ALPPS对比
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
6
Greater hypertrophy can be achieved with associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy compared to conventional staged hepatectomy, but with a higher price to pay?与传统分期肝切除术相比,联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术可实现更大程度的肥大,但要付出更高的代价?
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Operative Results and Oncologic Outcomes of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者行联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)与两阶段肝切除术(TSH)的手术结果及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):806-815. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4181-6.
8
Efficacy and safety of different options for liver regeneration of future liver remnant in patients with liver malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同方案促进肝脏恶性肿瘤患者剩余肝再生的疗效和安全性的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 16;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02867-w.
9
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases--Intermediate oncological results.结直肠癌肝转移患者肝段划分联合门静脉结扎分期肝切除术——中期肿瘤学结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Technical modifications and outcomes after Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) for primary liver malignancies: A systematic review.联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的二步肝切除术(ALPPS)治疗原发性肝癌的技术改良和结果:系统评价。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;33:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous Liver Venous Deprivation Following Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization Before Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Methods to Achieve Hypertrophy Liver Remnant.肝细胞癌大肝切除术前肝动脉化疗栓塞后同步肝静脉阻断:一种实现肝残余肥大的新方法
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Feb 5;12:219-229. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S495304. eCollection 2025.
2
Initial experience with Double-vein Embolization in Hungary.匈牙利双静脉栓塞术的初步经验。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2024 Nov 21;13:100613. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100613. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a single-center retrospective analysis.
联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的二步肝切除术(ALPPS)治疗伴有大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的疗效:一项单中心回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 28;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03538-8.
4
Assessment of Segmentary Hypertrophy of Future Remnant Liver after Liver Venous Deprivation: A Single-Center Study.肝静脉阻断后未来残余肝节段性肥大的评估:一项单中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 23;16(11):1982. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111982.
5
Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better oncological outcomes after ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases.辅助化疗与结直肠癌肝转移 ALPPS 术后更好的肿瘤学结果相关。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):855-868. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01835-1. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Single-Center Retrospective Study Comparing Double Vein Embolization via a Trans-Jugular Approach with Liver Venous Deprivation via a Trans-Hepatic Approach.经颈静脉途径双静脉栓塞与经肝途径肝静脉阻断的单中心回顾性研究
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1703-1712. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03538-3. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
7
Influence of cholestasis on portal vein embolization-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant.胆汁淤积对门静脉栓塞诱导未来肝残块肥大的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 21;408(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02784-w.
8
Liver Venous Deprivation Versus Portal Vein Embolization Before Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes.肝静脉阻断与门静脉栓塞在结直肠癌肝转移的大宗肝切除术前的应用:短期和中期结果的回顾性比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):296-305. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05551-2. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Portal vein embolization failure: Current strategies and future perspectives to improve liver hypertrophy before major oncological liver resection.门静脉栓塞失败:在大型肝脏肿瘤切除术前改善肝脏肥大的当前策略和未来展望
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Nov 15;14(11):2088-2096. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i11.2088.
10
Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis.同时门静脉和肝静脉栓塞与单独门静脉栓塞后双侧肝脏肿瘤可切除性的比较:荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141.