Escrivá-Martínez Tamara, Miragall Marta, Herrero Rocío, Rodríguez-Arias Marta, Baños Rosa M
Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Instituto Polibienestar, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
J Eat Disord. 2022 Jul 12;10(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00624-8.
COVID-19 confinement affected lifestyles. There is inconclusive evidence about changes in eating patterns, and there are few studies on the impact on body mass index (BMI), the occurrence of dysfunctional behaviors (binge eating, fat intake), and the predictive role of maladaptive eating styles (emotional, external, and restrained eating).
(1) To analyze the differences in binge eating, fat intake, BMI, and maladaptive eating styles before and during COVID-19 confinement, and (2) to analyze whether maladaptive eating styles (before confinement) predicted binge eating, fat intake, and BMI during confinement.
The sample consisted of 146 Spanish college students, divided into 104 females (71.2%; age: M = 22.20, SD = 2.97) and 42 males (28.8%; age: M = 24.74; SD = 3.53). All completed several dietary measures and BMI twice: before COVID-19 confinement (T1, November 2019) and during COVID-19 confinement (T2, April 2020).
BMI and maladaptive eating styles did not change in T2 (vs. T1). However, binge eating and fat intake decreased in T2. Emotional eating at T1 positively predicted BMI and binge eating at T2. External eating at T1 positively (and marginally) predicted fat intake at T2. Restrained eating at T1 positively predicted binge eating at T2, and negatively (and marginally) predicted BMI and fat intake at T2. The model explained 80.5% of the variance in BMI, 41.5% of the variance in binge eating, and 25.8% of the variance in fat intake during COVID-19 confinement.
The COVID-19 confinement had a positive impact on some eating behaviors. Future policies should focus part of their prevention on maladaptive eating styles to curb dysfunctional eating behaviors and BMI problems in times of stress.
新冠疫情封锁影响了生活方式。关于饮食模式的变化,证据尚无定论,且关于其对体重指数(BMI)、功能失调行为(暴饮暴食、脂肪摄入)的影响以及适应不良饮食方式(情绪化饮食、外部饮食和克制性饮食)的预测作用的研究较少。
(1)分析新冠疫情封锁前后暴饮暴食、脂肪摄入、BMI和适应不良饮食方式的差异,以及(2)分析适应不良饮食方式(封锁前)是否能预测封锁期间的暴饮暴食、脂肪摄入和BMI。
样本包括146名西班牙大学生,分为104名女性(71.2%;年龄:M = 22.20,标准差 = 2.97)和42名男性(28.8%;年龄:M = 24.74;标准差 = 3.53)。所有人在新冠疫情封锁前(T1,2019年11月)和封锁期间(T2,2020年4月)完成了多项饮食测量和BMI测量各两次。
T2(与T1相比)时BMI和适应不良饮食方式没有变化。然而,T2时暴饮暴食和脂肪摄入减少。T1时的情绪化饮食正向预测T2时的BMI和暴饮暴食。T1时的外部饮食正向(且接近显著)预测T2时的脂肪摄入。T1时的克制性饮食正向预测T2时的暴饮暴食,负向(且接近显著)预测T2时的BMI和脂肪摄入。该模型解释了新冠疫情封锁期间BMI变异的80.5%、暴饮暴食变异的41.5%和脂肪摄入变异的25.8%。
新冠疫情封锁对某些饮食行为有积极影响。未来的政策应将部分预防重点放在适应不良的饮食方式上,以在压力时期抑制功能失调的饮食行为和BMI问题。