Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT, 06269-1020, USA.
Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture, Texas A&M University, 308 Harrington Tower, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105699. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105699. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
The transition to college is a critical developmental window during which eating behaviors are susceptible to dysregulation. Changes in exposure to discrimination contribute to alterations in eating behaviors, which may be exacerbated or attenuated by coping styles. The present longitudinal study examines whether increases in perceived discrimination predict increases in overeating and decreases in eating well during the transition to college. We expect that adaptive coping styles will buffer against, while maladaptive coping styles will exacerbate, the effects of increases in perceived discrimination on increases in overeating and decreases in eating well. First year students (n = 804) were assessed at two time points: the spring before freshman year (Time 1) and one year later during the spring semester of freshman year (Time 2). Two distinct coping styles emerged from a factor analysis: adaptive (active coping, planning, emotional support, positive reframing, acceptance, instrumental support) and maladaptive coping (denial, venting, self-blame, self-distraction). Increases in perceived discrimination, lower adaptive coping, and higher maladaptive coping had main effects for predicting more overeating at Time 2. Among students who reported increases in perceived discrimination, higher use of adaptive coping was associated with less overeating at Time 2 while higher use of maladaptive coping was associated with more overeating. While adaptive and maladaptive coping styles had main effects on eating well, change in perceived discrimination did not. Neither adaptive nor maladaptive coping styles interacted with change in perceived discrimination to predict eating well. Findings inform a gap in the literature about the relationship between discrimination and eating behaviors from a developmental perspective by demonstrating that adaptive and maladaptive coping styles influence the effects of changes in perceived discrimination on overeating during the college transition.
从高中过渡到大学是一个关键的发展时期,在此期间,饮食习惯容易失调。接触到的歧视的变化导致了饮食习惯的改变,而应对方式可能会加剧或减轻这种改变。本纵向研究考察了在进入大学的过渡期间,感知歧视的增加是否预示着暴食和饮食不良的增加。我们预计,适应性应对方式将起到缓冲作用,而适应不良的应对方式将加剧感知歧视增加对暴食和饮食不良减少的影响。804 名一年级学生在两个时间点接受评估:新生学年前的春季(时间 1)和新生学年春季学期的一年后(时间 2)。从因素分析中得出了两种不同的应对方式:适应性(积极应对、计划、情感支持、积极重新构建、接受、工具性支持)和适应不良的应对方式(否认、发泄、自责、自我分散注意力)。感知歧视的增加、较低的适应性应对以及较高的适应不良应对都对预测时间 2 时的暴食行为有主要影响。在报告感知歧视增加的学生中,较高的适应性应对与时间 2 时的暴食减少有关,而较高的适应不良应对与暴食增加有关。虽然适应性和适应不良的应对方式对饮食良好有主要影响,但感知歧视的变化并没有。适应性和适应不良的应对方式都没有与感知歧视的变化相互作用,以预测饮食良好。这些发现从发展的角度说明了歧视与饮食行为之间的关系,填补了文献中的空白,表明适应性和适应不良的应对方式影响了感知歧视变化对大学过渡期间暴食的影响。