Herron Lisa-Maree, Phillips Georgina, Brolan Claire E, Mitchell Rob, O'Reilly Gerard, Sharma Deepak, Körver Sarah, Kendino Mangu, Poloniati Penisimani, Kafoa Berlin, Cox Megan
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Aug;25:100519. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100519. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to test health systems resilience worldwide. Low- and middle-income country (LMIC) health care systems have considerable experience in disasters and disease outbreaks. Lessons from the preparedness and responses to COVID-19 in LMICs may be valuable to other countries.This policy paper synthesises findings from a multiphase qualitative research project, conducted during the pandemic to document experiences of Pacific Island Country and Territory (PICT) frontline clinicians and emergency care (EC) stakeholders. Thematic analysis and synthesis of enablers related to each of the Pacific EC systems building blocks identified key factors contributing to strengthened EC systems.Effective health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic occurred when frontline clinicians and 'decision makers' collaborated with respect and open communication, overcoming healthcare workers' fear and discontent. PICT EC clinicians demonstrated natural leadership and strengthened local EC systems, supporting essential healthcare. Despite resource limitations, PICT cultural strengths of relational connection and innovation ensured health system resilience. COVID-19 significantly disrupted services, with long-tail impacts on non-communicable disease and other health burdens.Lessons learned in responding to COVID-19 can be applied to ongoing health system strengthening initiatives. Optimal systems improvement and sustainability requires EC leaders' involvement in current decision-making as well as future planning.
Search strategy and selection criteria We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, WHO resources, Pacific and grey literature using search terms 'emergency care', 'acute/critical care', 'health care workers', 'emergency care systems/health systems', 'health system building blocks', 'COVID-19', 'pandemic/surge event/disease outbreaks' 'Low- and Middle-Income Countries', 'Pacific Islands/region' and related terms. Only English-language articles were included.
Phases 1 and 2A of this study were part of an Epidemic Ethics/World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, supported by Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office/Wellcome Grant 214711/Z/18/Z. Copyright of the original work on which this publication is based belongs to WHO. The authors have been given permission to publish this manuscript. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of WHO. Co-funding for this research was received from the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Foundation via an International Development Fund Grant. RM is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship and a Monash Graduate Excellence Scholarship. GOR is supported by a NHMRC Early Career Research Fellowship. CEB is supported by a University of Queensland Development Research Fellowship. None of these funders played any role in study design, results analysis or manuscript preparation.
新冠疫情仍在考验全球卫生系统的韧性。低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的医疗保健系统在应对灾害和疾病爆发方面有丰富经验。低收入和中等收入国家在新冠疫情防范和应对方面的经验教训可能对其他国家有重要价值。本政策文件综合了一个多阶段定性研究项目的结果,该项目在疫情期间开展,记录了太平洋岛国和领地(PICT)一线临床医生及急诊护理(EC)利益相关者的经历。对与太平洋急诊护理系统各个组成部分相关的促进因素进行主题分析和综合,确定了有助于加强急诊护理系统的关键因素。当一线临床医生和“决策者”相互尊重并开放沟通、克服医护人员的恐惧和不满时,卫生系统对新冠疫情做出了有效的应对。太平洋岛国和领地的急诊护理临床医生展现出了自然领导力,加强了当地的急诊护理系统,支持了基本医疗服务。尽管资源有限,但太平洋岛国和领地在人际关系和创新方面的文化优势确保了卫生系统的韧性。新冠疫情严重扰乱了服务,对非传染性疾病和其他健康负担产生了长期影响。应对新冠疫情所吸取的经验教训可应用于当前正在进行的卫生系统强化举措。最佳的系统改进和可持续性要求急诊护理领导者参与当前的决策以及未来的规划。
检索策略和选择标准 我们使用搜索词“急诊护理”“急性/重症护理”“医护人员”“急诊护理系统/卫生系统”“卫生系统组成部分”“新冠病毒”“大流行/激增事件/疾病爆发”“低收入和中等收入国家”“太平洋岛屿/地区”及相关术语,在PubMed、谷歌学术、Ovid、世界卫生组织资源、太平洋文献和灰色文献中进行检索。仅纳入英文文章。
本研究的第1阶段和第2A阶段是由外交、联邦和发展办公室/惠康基金214711/Z/18/Z支持的“流行病情伦理学/世界卫生组织(WHO)”倡议的一部分。本出版物所基于的原始作品版权属于世界卫生组织。作者已获许可发表本手稿。仅作者对本出版物中表达的观点负责,这些观点不一定代表世界卫生组织的观点、决定或政策。本研究还通过澳大利亚急诊医学学院基金会的国际发展基金赠款获得了共同资助。RM得到了澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)研究生奖学金和莫纳什卓越研究生奖学金的支持。GOR得到了NHMRC早期职业研究奖学金的支持。CEB得到了昆士兰大学发展研究奖学金的支持。这些资助者在研究设计、结果分析或稿件准备过程中均未发挥任何作用。