Suppr超能文献

查加斯贲门失弛缓症患者生活质量受损及其相关临床因素。

IMPAIRED QUALITY OF LIFE IN CHAGAS ACALASIA PATIENTS AND ASSOCIATED CLINICAL FACTORS.

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Londrina, PR, Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr-Jun;59(2):281-287. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202202000-50.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No study has focused on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) for Chagas Achalasia patients. Objective: To compare HRQoL between Chagas Achalasia patients and the general population; and to correlate HRQoL with clinical factors that can affect it.

METHODS

Sixty Chagas Achalasia patients and 50 controls were evaluated. All patients underwent esophageal manometry for the diagnosis of achalasia and esophagogram to determine the grade of megaesophagus. Three questionnaires were used: 1) clinical: the following data were collected: demographic, medical history, body mass index, occurrence of six esophageal symptoms (Esophageal Symptom Score: number of symptoms reported by patients), duration of dysphagia; 2) socio-economic-cultural status evaluation: patients and controls answered seven questions about their socio-economic-cultural conditions; 3) HRQoL: the validated Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire (license QM020039) was used. It measures health in eight domains: 3a) four physical: physical functioning, role limitations relating to physical health, bodily pain, and general health perception; 3b) four mental: vitality, social functioning, role limitations relating to emotional health, and mental health. These domains can be summarized into Physical and Mental Summary scores. We analyzed correlations between SF-36 Physical/Mental Summary Component scores and the following clinical factors: Esophageal Symptom Score, duration of dysphagia, body mass index, grades of megaesophagus (defined by the esophagogram) and presence/absence of megacolon (defined by opaque enema).

RESULTS

Patients and controls had similar age, gender, medical history, and socio-economic-cultural lifestyles (P>0.05). All patients had dysphagia and megaesophagus. SF-36 scores were significantly lower in Chagas Achalasia patients than controls for all eight domains (physicals: P<0.002; mentals: P<0.0027). The Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were also lower in Chagas Achalasia patients than controls (P<0.0062). For patients, the Physical Summary score was negatively correlated to Esophageal Symptom Score (P=0.0011) and positively correlated to body mass index (P=0.02). No other correlations were found.

CONCLUSION

Chagas Achalasia patients have an impaired HRQoL in all physical and mental domains. Patients reporting more symptoms had worse physical domains. Patients with higher body mass index had better physical domains.

摘要

背景

目前尚无研究关注恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。目的:比较恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者与普通人群的 HRQoL;并分析 HRQoL 与可能影响其的临床因素之间的相关性。

方法

共评估了 60 例恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者和 50 名对照者。所有患者均接受食管测压以诊断贲门失弛缓症,并进行食管造影以确定巨食管的严重程度。使用了三种问卷:1)临床问卷:收集以下数据:人口统计学、病史、体重指数、六种食管症状的发生情况(食管症状评分:患者报告的症状数量)、吞咽困难持续时间;2)社会经济文化状况评估问卷:患者和对照者回答了七个关于其社会经济文化状况的问题;3)HRQoL 问卷:使用经过验证的巴西-葡萄牙语版简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)(许可证 QM020039)。它在以下 8 个领域衡量健康状况:3a)4 个身体领域:身体功能、与身体健康相关的角色限制、身体疼痛和总体健康感知;3b)4 个心理领域:活力、社会功能、与情绪健康相关的角色限制和心理健康。这些领域可以概括为身体和心理综合评分。我们分析了 SF-36 身体/心理综合评分与以下临床因素之间的相关性:食管症状评分、吞咽困难持续时间、体重指数、巨食管严重程度(根据食管造影定义)以及巨结肠的存在/不存在(根据不透射线灌肠定义)。

结果

患者和对照者的年龄、性别、病史和社会经济文化生活方式相似(P>0.05)。所有患者均有吞咽困难和巨食管。恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者在所有 8 个领域的 SF-36 评分均明显低于对照者(身体领域:P<0.002;心理领域:P<0.0027)。恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者的身体和心理综合评分也低于对照者(P<0.0062)。对于患者,身体综合评分与食管症状评分呈负相关(P=0.0011),与体重指数呈正相关(P=0.02)。未发现其他相关性。

结论

恰加斯贲门失弛缓症患者在所有身体和心理领域的 HRQoL 均受损。报告症状较多的患者身体各领域评分较差。体重指数较高的患者身体各领域评分较好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验