Reproductive Rights in Neurology-The Supreme Court's Impact on All of Us.
作者信息
LaHue Sara C, Gano Dawn, Bove Riley
机构信息
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.
出版信息
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):961-962. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2347.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reproductive Rights in Neurology-The Supreme Court's Impact on All of Us.神经学中的生殖权利——最高法院对我们所有人的影响。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):961-962. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2347.
2
Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.在美国多布斯案之后推进生育公平
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1689-1690. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19468.
3
Abortion Training in Medical Education - Implications of the Supreme Court's Upcoming Decision.医学教育中的堕胎培训——最高法院即将做出的裁决的影响
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 24;386(8):707-709. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2117368. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.最高法院的春季开庭期：堕胎、死亡权与隐私权的式微
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):919-28. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-919.
5
Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.通过远程医疗进行药物流产：爱荷华州最高法院一项裁决的影响
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):313-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001251.
6
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后，与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势：州法律有多大影响？
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
7
The Alabama Embryo Decision-The Politics and Reality of Recognizing "Extrauterine Children".阿拉巴马胚胎判决——承认“宫外儿童”的政治与现实
JAMA. 2024 Apr 2;331(13):1083-1084. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3559.
8
Remote Reproductive Rights.远程生殖权利
Am J Law Med. 2022 Jul;48(2-3):244-255. doi: 10.1017/amj.2022.29.
9
Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.堕胎披露法与第一修正案：最高法院贝塞拉裁决对更广泛公共健康的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):412-418. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304871. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Challenging the US Supreme Court's Majority Ruling on at the International Human Rights Level.在国际人权层面质疑美国最高法院多数派裁决 。
Health Hum Rights. 2023 Jun;25(1):195-206.
本文引用的文献
1
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国堕胎监测报告》。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1.
2
Health Disparities, Inequities, and Social Determinants of Health in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders in the US: A Review.美国多发性硬化症及相关疾病的健康差异、不平等和社会决定因素：综述。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Dec 1;78(12):1515-1524. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3416.
3
Self-reported Physical Health of Women Who Did and Did Not Terminate Pregnancy After Seeking Abortion Services: A Cohort Study.寻求堕胎服务后选择终止妊娠和未终止妊娠的女性自我报告的身体健康状况：一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):238-247. doi: 10.7326/M18-1666. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Pregnancy outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide: Clinical study data and 5 years of post-marketing experience.多发性硬化症患者使用特立氟胺的妊娠结局：临床研究数据和 5 年上市后经验。
Mult Scler. 2020 Jun;26(7):829-836. doi: 10.1177/1352458519843055. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.美国希望堕胎的妇女和被拒绝堕胎的妇女的社会经济结果。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):407-413. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient.胎儿作为患者的伦理维度。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug;43:2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
7
Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy.在人类妊娠中药物致畸性的知识不断发展。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011 Aug 15;157C(3):175-82. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30313. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion.2000 年至 2008 年堕胎率的变化与堕胎终身发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1358-1366. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e.
Zotero 插件