• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000 年至 2008 年堕胎率的变化与堕胎终身发生率。

Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion.

机构信息

From the Guttmacher Institute, Research Division, New York, New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1358-1366. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e
PMID:21606746
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate abortion rates among subpopulations of women in 2008, assess changes in subpopulation abortion rates since 2000, and estimate the lifetime incidence of abortion.

METHODS

We combined secondary data from several sources, including the 2008 Abortion Patient Survey, the Current Population Surveys for 2008 and 2009, and the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth, to estimate abortion rates by subgroup and lifetime incidence of abortion for U.S. women of reproductive age.

RESULTS

The abortion rate declined 8.0% between 2000 and 2008, from 21.3 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 to 19.6 per 1,000. Decreases in abortion were experienced by most subgroups of women. One notable exception was poor women; this group accounted for 42.4% of abortions in 2008, and their abortion rate increased 17.5% between 2000 and 2008 from 44.4 to 52.2 abortions per 1,000. In addition to poor women, abortion rates were highest for women who were cohabiting (52.0 per 1,000), aged 20-24 (39.9 per 1,000), or non-Hispanic African American (40.2 per 1,000). If the 2008 abortion rate prevails, 30.0% of women will have an abortion by age 45.

CONCLUSION

Abortion is becoming increasingly concentrated among poor women, and restrictions on abortion disproportionately affect this population.

摘要

目的

估计 2008 年女性亚人群的堕胎率,评估自 2000 年以来亚人群堕胎率的变化,并估计堕胎的终身发生率。

方法

我们结合了多个来源的二级数据,包括 2008 年堕胎患者调查、2008 年和 2009 年的当前人口调查,以及 2006-2008 年全国家庭增长调查,以估计美国育龄妇女的亚人群堕胎率和堕胎的终身发生率。

结果

2000 年至 2008 年期间,堕胎率下降了 8.0%,从每 1000 名 15-44 岁女性中有 21.3 例堕胎降至每 1000 名 19.6 例。大多数女性亚群都经历了堕胎率的下降。一个值得注意的例外是贫困妇女;2008 年,这一群体占堕胎总数的 42.4%,她们的堕胎率在 2000 年至 2008 年间从每 1000 名 44.4 例增加到 52.2 例,增长了 17.5%。除了贫困妇女,堕胎率最高的是同居(每 1000 名 52.0 例)、20-24 岁(每 1000 名 39.9 例)或非西班牙裔非裔美国妇女(每 1000 名 40.2 例)。如果 2008 年的堕胎率持续下去,30.0%的女性到 45 岁时会堕胎。

结论

堕胎越来越集中在贫困妇女中,对堕胎的限制不成比例地影响了这一人群。

相似文献

1
Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion.2000 年至 2008 年堕胎率的变化与堕胎终身发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1358-1366. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c405e.
2
Unintended pregnancy in the United States.美国的意外怀孕。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46.
3
Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008-2014.2008 - 2014年美国不同人群的堕胎率及堕胎终身发生率
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1904-1909. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.2014年美国的堕胎发生率与服务可及性
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Abortion surveillance--United States, 2009.流产监测——美国,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 23;61(8):1-44.
6
Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.美国 2011 年的堕胎发生率和服务提供情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Mar;46(1):3-14. doi: 10.1363/46e0414. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
7
Induced abortion incidence and safety in Côte d'Ivoire.科特迪瓦的人工流产发生率和安全性。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232364. eCollection 2020.
8
An estimate of lifetime incidence of abortion in the United States using the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.利用 2021-2022 年堕胎患者调查估计美国堕胎的终生发生率。
Contraception. 2024 Jul;135:110445. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110445. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.美国意外妊娠:发生率和差异,2006 年。
Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
10
Fertility and abortion rates in the United States, 1960-2002.1960 - 2002年美国的生育率和堕胎率。
Int J Androl. 2006 Feb;29(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00638.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题:美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
2
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.《2022 年美国堕胎监测报告》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Nov 28;73(7):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.
3
The impact of hostile abortion legislation on the United States maternal mortality crisis: a call for increased abortion education.
敌对堕胎立法对美国产妇死亡率危机的影响:呼吁增加堕胎教育。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;11:1291668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1291668. eCollection 2023.
4
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.人工流产监测-美国,2021 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Nov 24;72(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1.
5
Exploring Google Searches for Out-of-Clinic Medication Abortion in the United States During 2020: Infodemiology Approach Using Multiple Samples.2020年美国非诊所药物流产的谷歌搜索探索:使用多样本的信息流行病学方法
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 May 12;2(1):e33184. doi: 10.2196/33184. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
6
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020.《2020 年美国堕胎监测》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Nov 25;71(10):1-27. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1.
7
Infection and Threatened Abortion in Women from Northern Peru.秘鲁北部妇女的感染与难免流产。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 8;2022:1163655. doi: 10.1155/2022/1163655. eCollection 2022.
8
Reproductive Rights in Neurology-The Supreme Court's Impact on All of Us.神经学中的生殖权利——最高法院对我们所有人的影响。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):961-962. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2347.
9
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国堕胎监测报告》。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1.
10
Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.美国限制堕胎政策差异和不良生育结果中的种族/民族和教育不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07165-x.