Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington; and.
Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, Oregon.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Nov;19(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202108-964OC.
When drainage of complicated pleural space infections alone fails, there exists two strategies in surgery and dual agent-intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy; however, studies comparing these two management strategies are limited. To determine the outcomes of surgery versus fibrinolytic therapy as the primary management for complicated pleural space infections (CPSI). A retrospective review of adults with a CPSI managed with surgery or fibrinolytics between 1/2015 and 3/2018 within a multicenter, multistate hospital system was performed. Fibrinolytics was defined as dose of dual-agent fibrinolytic therapy and fibrinolytics as 5-6 doses twice daily. Treatment failure was defined as persistent infection with a pleural collection requiring intervention. Crossover was defined by any fibrinolytics after surgery or surgery after fibrinolytics. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to account for selection bias effect of management strategies in treatment failure and crossover. We identified 566 patients. Surgery was the initial strategy in 55% (311/566). The surgery group had less additional treatments (surgery: 10% [32/311] versus fibrinolytics: 39% [100/255], 0.001), treatment failures (surgery: 7% [22/311] versus fibrinolytics: 29% [74/255], 0.001), and crossovers (surgery: 6% [20/311] versus fibrinolytics: 19% [49/255], 0.001). Logistic regression analysis with IPTW demonstrated a lower odds of treatment failure with surgery compared with any fibrinolytics (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.30; < 0.001); and compared with standard fibrinolytics (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11-0.35; < 0.001). Although there is a lack of consensus as to the optimal management strategy for patients with a CPSI, in surgical candidates, operative management may offer more benefits and could be considered early in the management course. However, our study is retrospective and nonrandomized; thus, prospective trials are needed to explore this further.
当单纯引流复杂胸腔感染失败时,手术和双重局部纤维蛋白溶解疗法有两种策略;然而,比较这两种管理策略的研究有限。本研究旨在确定手术与纤维蛋白溶解疗法作为治疗复杂胸腔感染(CPSI)的主要手段的结果。对 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月期间在一个多中心、多州医院系统中接受手术或纤维蛋白溶解剂治疗的成人 CPSI 进行回顾性研究。纤维蛋白溶解剂定义为双重局部纤维蛋白溶解治疗剂量,纤维蛋白溶解剂为每日两次 5-6 次剂量。治疗失败定义为持续存在感染性胸腔积液需要干预。交叉定义为手术后任何纤维蛋白溶解剂或纤维蛋白溶解剂后手术。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)逻辑回归来考虑治疗失败和交叉的管理策略的选择偏差效应。我们共纳入 566 例患者。55%(311/566)的患者最初采用手术治疗。手术组的额外治疗较少(手术组:10%[32/311],纤维蛋白溶解组:39%[100/255],0.001),治疗失败(手术组:7%[22/311],纤维蛋白溶解组:29%[74/255],0.001),交叉(手术组:6%[20/311],纤维蛋白溶解组:19%[49/255],0.001)。IPTW 逻辑回归分析显示,与任何纤维蛋白溶解剂相比,手术治疗的治疗失败可能性较低(比值比 [OR],0.20;95%置信区间 [CI],0.10-0.30; <0.001);与标准纤维蛋白溶解剂相比(OR,0.20;95%CI,0.11-0.35; <0.001)。尽管对于 CPSI 患者的最佳管理策略尚未达成共识,但对于手术候选人,手术治疗可能带来更多益处,并可在管理过程早期考虑。然而,我们的研究是回顾性和非随机的;因此,需要进一步开展前瞻性试验来探讨这一问题。