de Jonge Weija R, Smits Bo, Ket Johannes C F, Altenburg Josje, Annema Jouke, Daniels Johannes M A, Dickhoff Chris, van Dorp Martijn, Braun Jerry, Korevaar Daniel A, Heineman David J
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Mar 3;11(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00619-2024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Parapneumonic pleural infections are frequently encountered, but the optimal treatment regimen remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether immediate video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has advantages over intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET).
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science Core Collection till November 2023 and included studies comparing IET and VATS in adult patients with parapneumonic pleural infections. Primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included mortality and morbidity. Study quality was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was performed.
We screened 2263 articles; eight were included in the final analysis, covering 1023 patients (n=465 IET (mostly single agent IET); n=558 VATS). Six were non-randomised studies (n=5 with serious risk of bias) comprising 964 patients, and two were small, randomised feasibility studies (n=1 with high risk of bias), comprising 59 patients. In the meta-analysis, LOS in non-randomised studies was shorter for patients treated by VATS (mean difference 4.2 days; 95% CI 1.5-7.0). However, no significant difference was reported in the randomised feasibility studies. Mortality and morbidity rates showed no significant difference.
In this meta-analysis of non-randomised studies with a high risk of selection bias, VATS appears superior to IET regarding LOS in the treatment of parapneumonic pleural infections, without increased mortality and morbidity rate. Two recently published randomised feasibility studies failed to confirm this finding, but were not designed to detect a difference in LOS. This meta-analysis highlights the need for high-quality studies.
肺炎旁胸腔感染较为常见,但最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。本系统评价的目的是研究即时电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)是否优于胸腔内酶疗法(IET)。
我们检索了截至2023年11月的MEDLINE、Embase和科学引文索引核心合集,并纳入了比较IET和VATS治疗成年肺炎旁胸腔感染患者的研究。主要结局是住院时间(LOS);次要结局包括死亡率和发病率。使用ROBINS-I和RoB 2评估研究质量。进行逆方差随机效应荟萃分析。
我们筛选了2263篇文章;最终分析纳入了8篇,涵盖1023例患者(n = 465例IET(大多为单药IET);n = 558例VATS)。6篇为非随机研究(n = 5篇存在严重偏倚风险),共964例患者,2篇为小型随机可行性研究(n = 1篇存在高偏倚风险),共59例患者。在荟萃分析中,非随机研究中接受VATS治疗的患者LOS较短(平均差4.2天;95%CI 1.5 - 7.0)。然而,随机可行性研究中未报告显著差异。死亡率和发病率无显著差异。
在这项存在高度选择偏倚风险的非随机研究荟萃分析中,VATS在治疗肺炎旁胸腔感染方面,在LOS方面似乎优于IET,且死亡率和发病率未增加。最近发表的两项随机可行性研究未能证实这一发现,但并非旨在检测LOS的差异。这项荟萃分析凸显了高质量研究的必要性。