• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较有和没有 2 型糖尿病的沙特女性的骨密度和骨折风险评估工具:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

From the Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2022 Jul;43(7):700-707. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.7.20220144.

DOI:10.15537/smj.2022.43.7.20220144
PMID:35830997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9749691/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the bone mineral density and the fracture risks in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out at Taibah Early Diagnostic Center, Al Madinah Al Munawarah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 465 women with and without T2DM aged ≥40 years who visited the center for a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan between December 2020 and July 2021 were randomly selected. The 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) were calculated using the Abu Dhabi Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with and without adjustment for T2DM. The adjustment was made by setting rheumatoid arthritis as the equivalent risk for T2DM in the FRAX. Bone mineral density values and the FRAX scores were compared between women with T2DM and non-diabetes.

RESULTS

Of 465 women, 214 had T2DM, and 251 were non-diabetics. The mean age of women was 59.42±7.9 years. There were no significant differences in mean age, menopausal status, height, weight, and body mass index between T2DM and non-diabetic women. Bone mineral density values and the unadjusted FRAX scores were comparable between the 2 groups. However, after adjusting FRAX for T2DM, the FRAX for MOF and HF became significantly higher in T2DM women (=0.000 and =0.004).

CONCLUSION

In Saudi women with T2DM, unadjusted FRAX underestimated the risk of MOF and HF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus should be included as one of the clinical risk factors for fracture in future versions of the FRAX score.

摘要

目的

比较有和无 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的沙特女性的骨密度和骨折风险。

方法

本横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯麦地那的 Taibah 早期诊断中心进行。共随机选择了 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 7 月期间因双能 X 线吸收法扫描而到中心就诊的 465 名年龄≥40 岁的有和无 T2DM 的女性。使用阿布扎比骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)计算 10 年主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)和髋部骨折(HF)的概率,同时考虑和不考虑 T2DM 进行调整。在 FRAX 中,将类风湿关节炎设定为 T2DM 的等效风险来进行调整。比较 T2DM 女性和非糖尿病女性的骨密度值和 FRAX 评分。

结果

465 名女性中,214 名患有 T2DM,251 名非糖尿病患者。女性的平均年龄为 59.42±7.9 岁。T2DM 组和非糖尿病组的平均年龄、绝经状态、身高、体重和体重指数无显著差异。两组间的骨密度值和未调整的 FRAX 评分无显著差异。然而,在调整 FRAX 以考虑 T2DM 后,T2DM 女性的 MOF 和 HF 的 FRAX 显著更高(=0.000 和=0.004)。

结论

在有 T2DM 的沙特女性中,未调整的 FRAX 低估了 MOF 和 HF 的风险。在未来的 FRAX 评分版本中,应将 2 型糖尿病纳入骨折的临床危险因素之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937e/9749691/690147ac7da0/SaudiMedJ-43-7-700_page_5_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937e/9749691/24eeeba4d666/SaudiMedJ-43-7-700_page_5_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937e/9749691/690147ac7da0/SaudiMedJ-43-7-700_page_5_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937e/9749691/24eeeba4d666/SaudiMedJ-43-7-700_page_5_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937e/9749691/690147ac7da0/SaudiMedJ-43-7-700_page_5_2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.比较有和没有 2 型糖尿病的沙特女性的骨密度和骨折风险评估工具:一项横断面研究。
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jul;43(7):700-707. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.7.20220144.
2
Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor for fragility fracture risk in elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 9-year ambispective longitudinal cohort study.老年营养风险指数作为2型糖尿病老年人脆性骨折风险的预测指标:一项9年的双向纵向队列研究
Clin Nutr. 2024 May;43(5):1125-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA in estimating fracture risk.FRAX 工具在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:使用糖化血红蛋白估计骨折风险。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Oct;55(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Prevalence of vertebral fractures and associated factors in thai diabetic postmenopausal women.泰国绝经后糖尿病女性的椎体骨折患病率及相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74463-9.
5
BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND PROBABILITY OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES IN WOMEN WITH TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUS.2型糖尿病女性的骨密度与骨质疏松性骨折概率
Wiad Lek. 2022;75(12):2920-2925. doi: 10.36740/WLek202212105.
6
Comparison of methods to improve fracture risk assessment in chinese diabetic postmenopausal women: a case-control study.比较不同方法改善中国绝经后糖尿病女性骨折风险评估的效果:一项病例对照研究。
Endocrine. 2021 Jul;73(1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02724-y. Epub 2021 May 1.
7
Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women with diabetes: comparison between DeFRA and FRAX tools.绝经后糖尿病女性的骨折风险评估:DeFRA与FRAX工具的比较
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018 May;34(5):404-408. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1407308. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
8
Longer Duration of Diabetes Strongly Impacts Fracture Risk Assessment: The Manitoba BMD Cohort.糖尿病病程延长对骨折风险评估有强烈影响:曼尼托巴骨密度队列研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):4489-4496. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2569. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
Comparison of FRAX in postmenopausal Asian women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.绝经后亚洲女性 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 FRAX 比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519879591. doi: 10.1177/0300060519879591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
THE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN HYPOVITAMINOSIS D, HIGHER PTH LEVELS WITH BONE MINERAL DENSITIES, AND RISK OF THE 10-YEAR PROBABILITY OF MAJOR OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH T2DM.维生素 D 缺乏症、甲状旁腺激素水平升高与骨密度的关系,以及中国 2 型糖尿病患者 10 年主要骨质疏松性骨折风险。
Endocr Pract. 2018 Apr;24(4):334-341. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0164.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Diabetes-A Systematic Review on BMD and Fractures.诊断糖尿病性骨质疏松症——BMD 和骨折的系统评价。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024 Apr;22(2):223-244. doi: 10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.使用FRAX工具对2型糖尿病成年患者进行骨折风险评估的应用情况评估。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 20;15(2):e35205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35205. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Comment on: Fracture risk assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of methods to improve fracture risk assessment in chinese diabetic postmenopausal women: a case-control study.比较不同方法改善中国绝经后糖尿病女性骨折风险评估的效果:一项病例对照研究。
Endocrine. 2021 Jul;73(1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02724-y. Epub 2021 May 1.
2
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.骨折风险评估工具可能无法提示 2 型糖尿病女性的骨骼脆弱性。
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;360(5):552-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
Comparison of FRAX in postmenopausal Asian women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.
评论:2型糖尿病患者的骨折风险评估
Saudi Med J. 2022 Sep;43(9):1066. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.9.20220601.
绝经后亚洲女性 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 FRAX 比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519879591. doi: 10.1177/0300060519879591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Osteoporosis and the Ageing Skeleton.骨质疏松症与衰老骨骼
Subcell Biochem. 2019;91:453-476. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3681-2_16.
5
Frailty and Risk of Fractures in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的虚弱与骨折风险。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):507-513. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1965. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Molecular Modulation of Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts in Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病中破骨细胞和成骨细胞的分子调节。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Nov 4;2018:6354787. doi: 10.1155/2018/6354787. eCollection 2018.
7
Hypoglycaemia is associated with increased risk of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.低血糖与 2 型糖尿病患者骨折风险增加相关:一项队列研究。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2019 Jan 1;180(1):51-58. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0458.
8
A brief history of FRAX.FRAX 的简史。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Oct 31;13(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0510-0.
9
Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge.糖尿病患者的骨脆弱症的诊断与管理:一个新出现的挑战。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Dec;29(12):2585-2596. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4650-2. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA in estimating fracture risk.FRAX 工具在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:使用糖化血红蛋白估计骨折风险。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Oct;55(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.