• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.使用FRAX工具对2型糖尿病成年患者进行骨折风险评估的应用情况评估。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 20;15(2):e35205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35205. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA in estimating fracture risk.FRAX 工具在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:使用糖化血红蛋白估计骨折风险。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Oct;55(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
3
Comparison of bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.比较有和没有 2 型糖尿病的沙特女性的骨密度和骨折风险评估工具:一项横断面研究。
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jul;43(7):700-707. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.7.20220144.
4
Bone metabolism and the 10-year probability of hip fracture and a major osteoporotic fracture using the country-specific FRAX algorithm in men over 50 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study.50 岁以上 2 型糖尿病男性患者应用基于本国人群的 FRAX 算法评估骨代谢与 10 年内髋部骨折及主要骨质疏松性骨折的 10 年发病概率:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;32(8):1161-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2254-y. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
5
The Clinical Value of the RA-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in the Fracture Risk Prediction of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China.类风湿性关节炎调整后的骨折风险评估工具在中国2型糖尿病患者骨折风险预测中的临床价值
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jan 29;14:327-333. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S296399. eCollection 2021.
6
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.骨折风险评估工具可能无法提示 2 型糖尿病女性的骨骼脆弱性。
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;360(5):552-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Major osteoporosis fracture prediction in type 2 diabetes: a derivation and comparison study.2 型糖尿病患者的主要骨质疏松性骨折预测:一项推导和比较研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Sep;33(9):1957-1967. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06425-8. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
[Osteoporosis - whom to treat? The importance of FRAX® in Switzerland].[骨质疏松症——该治疗谁?FRAX®在瑞士的重要性]
Ther Umsch. 2012 Mar;69(3):207-13. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000275.
9
Comparison of Trabecular Bone Score-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment (TBS-FRAX) and FRAX Tools for Identification of High Fracture Risk among Taiwanese Adults Aged 50 to 90 Years with or without Prediabetes and Diabetes.比较 TBS-FRAX(骨小梁评分调整骨折风险评估)和 FRAX 工具在识别有无糖尿病的 50 岁至 90 岁台湾成年人中骨折高风险的应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 30;58(12):1766. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121766.
10
Comparison of FRAX in postmenopausal Asian women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.绝经后亚洲女性 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 FRAX 比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519879591. doi: 10.1177/0300060519879591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Overactive Bladder and Bone Fracture Risk in Female Patients.女性患者膀胱过度活动症与骨折风险的关系。
In Vivo. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):2031-2040. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13661.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Saudi women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study.比较有和没有 2 型糖尿病的沙特女性的骨密度和骨折风险评估工具:一项横断面研究。
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jul;43(7):700-707. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.7.20220144.
2
SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe.《2021年欧洲骨质疏松症评分指南》:欧洲骨质疏松症的新记分卡
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Jun 2;16(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9.
3
The Clinical Value of the RA-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in the Fracture Risk Prediction of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China.类风湿性关节炎调整后的骨折风险评估工具在中国2型糖尿病患者骨折风险预测中的临床价值
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jan 29;14:327-333. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S296399. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of FRAX in postmenopausal Asian women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.绝经后亚洲女性 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 FRAX 比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519879591. doi: 10.1177/0300060519879591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge.糖尿病患者的骨脆弱症的诊断与管理:一个新出现的挑战。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Dec;29(12):2585-2596. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4650-2. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA in estimating fracture risk.FRAX 工具在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:使用糖化血红蛋白估计骨折风险。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Oct;55(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1187-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
7
Portuguese recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis and management of primary osteoporosis - 2018 update.葡萄牙原发性骨质疏松症预防、诊断与管理建议——2018年更新版
Acta Reumatol Port. 2018 Jan-Mar;43(1):10-31.
8
Association of Bone Mineral Density, Bone Turnover Markers, and Vertebral Fractures with All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者的骨密度、骨转换标志物与椎体骨折和全因死亡率的关系。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Jan;102(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0324-x. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
9
Diabetes, bone and glucose-lowering agents: clinical outcomes.糖尿病、骨骼与降糖药物:临床结局。
Diabetologia. 2017 Jul;60(7):1170-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4283-6. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Comparison of trabecular bone score and hip structural analysis with FRAX in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病绝经后女性中骨小梁评分和髋部结构分析与FRAX的比较
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):951-957. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0634-2. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

使用FRAX工具对2型糖尿病成年患者进行骨折风险评估的应用情况评估。

Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Santos Monteiro Sílvia, da Silva Santos Tiago, Fonseca Liliana, Dores Jorge

机构信息

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António (CHUdSA), Porto, PRT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Feb 20;15(2):e35205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35205. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.35205
PMID:36960265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10031547/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.

METHODS

We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.

RESULTS

One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).

CONCLUSIONS

More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.

摘要

背景

脆性骨折日益被认为是2型糖尿病(T2DM)的一种并发症。FRAX-Port®是一种计算工具,可评估主要骨折和髋部骨折的10年风险,整合了包括T2DM在内的多种临床风险因素。我们旨在评估T2DM成人患者的骨折风险,并确定接受抗骨质疏松治疗的高骨折风险患者比例。

方法

我们开展了一项横断面研究,纳入了在2019年至2022年期间于我们的三级中心就诊的T2DM成人便利样本。根据FRAX-Port®评估骨折风险。

结果

共纳入100名成人,男性占54%,平均年龄为68.4±9.2岁。在骨折风险因素方面,17%曾有脆性骨折史,12%的父母有髋部骨折史,9%有活跃饮酒情况,4%有活跃吸烟情况。此外,17%存在继发性骨质疏松,最常见的原因是全身性皮质类固醇暴露(10%)。关于糖尿病特异性风险因素,94%的糖尿病病程超过5年;70%的糖化血红蛋白大于7%;42%有糖尿病视网膜病变,33%有糖尿病慢性肾病,18%有周围神经病变,7%有自主神经病变;83%使用胰岛素,2%使用卡格列净,1%使用吡格列酮。根据FRAX-Port®,主要骨折的中位概率为6.8%(四分位间距6.9),髋部骨折为2.4%(四分位间距3.9)。骨折风险高、中、低的比例分别为41%、15%和44%。最后,56%的参与者应进行骨密度测定,45%有正式建议开始抗骨质疏松治疗。然而,只有6%的患者正在接受抗骨质疏松治疗:双膦酸盐(5%)和地诺单抗(1%)。

结论

超过三分之一接受评估的T2DM患者骨折风险高。我们发现FRAX-Port®是一种易于应用的工具,有助于决定是否进行骨密度测定或开始抗骨质疏松治疗。鉴于T2DM的患病率不断上升以及相关的跌倒风险,本研究强调了认识这些患者骨折风险的必要性,这在T2DM成人不良事件风险因素筛查中通常是一个被遗忘的并发症。