Departamento de Bioquímica, Farmacologia e Fisiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Neurociências, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Sep;56(5):4546-4557. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15771. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
Studies regarding the animals' innate preferences help elucidate and avoid probable sources of bias and serve as a reference to improve and develop new behavioural tasks. In zebrafish research, data obtained in behavioural assessments are often not replicated between research groups or even inside the same laboratory raising huge concerns about replicability and reproducibility. Among the potential causes that are not well considered, sexual differences can be a probable source of bias. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the male and female zebrafish directional and colour preferences in the plus-maze and T-maze behavioural tasks. Experiment 1 evaluated directional preference, and experiment 2 evaluated colour preference in a plus-maze task; experiment 3 evaluated preference between black or white in a T-maze task. Individual preferences were expressed as the percentage of time spent in each zone. Our results showed that male and female zebrafish demonstrated no difference in directional preference in the plus-maze task. Surprisingly, male and female zebrafish showed colour preference differences in the plus-maze task; males did not show any colour preference, while female zebrafish demonstrated a red preference compared to white, blue and yellow colours. Moreover, both male and female zebrafish demonstrated a strong black colour preference compared to the white colour in the T-maze task. Our findings characterized the spontaneous preference of male and female zebrafish for direction and colour, identifying possible biases and providing insights that contribute to the standardization of future protocols.
关于动物先天偏好的研究有助于阐明和避免可能的偏倚来源,并作为改进和开发新行为任务的参考。在斑马鱼研究中,行为评估中获得的数据在研究小组之间甚至在同一个实验室中往往无法复制,这引起了人们对可重复性的极大关注。在未被充分考虑的潜在原因中,性别差异可能是一个潜在的偏倚来源。因此,本研究旨在调查雄性和雌性斑马鱼在正字迷宫和 T 迷宫行为任务中的方向和颜色偏好。实验 1 评估了方向偏好,实验 2 评估了正字迷宫任务中的颜色偏好;实验 3 评估了 T 迷宫任务中黑色与白色之间的偏好。个体偏好表示为在每个区域花费的时间百分比。我们的结果表明,雄性和雌性斑马鱼在正字迷宫任务中的方向偏好没有差异。令人惊讶的是,雄性和雌性斑马鱼在正字迷宫任务中表现出颜色偏好差异;雄性斑马鱼没有表现出任何颜色偏好,而雌性斑马鱼表现出对红色的偏好,而不是白色、蓝色和黄色。此外,雄性和雌性斑马鱼在 T 迷宫任务中都表现出对黑色的强烈偏好,而不是对白色的偏好。我们的研究结果描述了雄性和雌性斑马鱼对方向和颜色的自发偏好,确定了可能的偏差,并为未来协议的标准化提供了见解。