Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410012, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Hunan Key Laboratory of Molecular Precision Medicine, Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16216-0.
This retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in stage II-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Patients treated with cisplatin-based or nedaplatin-based chemoradiotherapy between January 2012 and December 2015 were evaluated. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. A cohort of 538 NPC patients was enrolled. There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) between the cisplatin and nedaplatin groups. During the whole treatment course, patients in the cisplatin group had higher incidences of grade 3‒4 vomiting and anorexia, while patients in the nedaplatin group had higher incidences of grade 3‒4 leucopenia and mucositis. In terms of late toxicities, patients in the cisplatin group had a higher incidence of xerostomia. In multivariate analysis, T stage, N stage, and clinical stage were prognostic factors for OS, PFS, and DMFS. In subgroup analyses, nedaplatin-based chemotherapy achieved comparable treatment outcomes in specific populations stratified by age, sex, ECOG PS score and clinical stage. Cisplatin and nedaplatin are effective choices for stage II-IVa NPC patients, with a different spectrum of side effects.
这项回顾性研究比较了奈达铂为基础的放化疗与顺铂为基础的放化疗在 II-IVa 期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者中的疗效和安全性。评估了 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受顺铂或奈达铂为基础的放化疗的患者。生存情况通过 Kaplan-Meier 法估计,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险模型进行多变量分析。共纳入 538 例 NPC 患者。顺铂组和奈达铂组 5 年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)和无远处转移生存率(DMFS)无显著差异。在整个治疗过程中,顺铂组的 3-4 级呕吐和厌食发生率较高,而奈达铂组的 3-4 级白细胞减少和黏膜炎发生率较高。在晚期毒性方面,顺铂组口干发生率较高。多变量分析显示,T 分期、N 分期和临床分期是 OS、PFS 和 DMFS 的预后因素。亚组分析显示,奈达铂为基础的化疗在年龄、性别、ECOG PS 评分和临床分期分层的特定人群中取得了相似的治疗效果。顺铂和奈达铂都是 II-IVa 期 NPC 患者的有效选择,具有不同的副作用谱。