Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗与辅助化疗联合同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:倾向评分匹配分析。

Induction versus adjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.

Department of Orthopedics, Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518000, PR China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2020 Jun;105:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104686. Epub 2020 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The propensity score-matched (PSM) method was adopted to balance variables. We identified independent prognostic factors using Cox regression analysis and compared outcomes between two chemotherapy treatment combinations for patients in different subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 550 patients were selected by one-to-two PSM. Survival outcomes for the matched data set indicated that the IC + CCRT group achieved higher 5-year overall survival (OS; 89.3% vs 85.3%, P = 0.119), failure-free survival (FFS; 80.2% vs 79.0%, P = 0.722) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 87.4% vs 84.4%, P = 0.322) compared with CCRT + AC, although this was statistically non-significant. Subgroup analysis revealed that IC + CCRT was associated with significantly improved OS (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.68, 95% Confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-6.22, P = 0.017), FFS (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.06-3.57, P = 0.029) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS; HR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.04-6.68, P = 0.034) in T3 disease. Moreover, this combination of treatment could significantly prolong OS (HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.41-9.80, P = 0.004) in N2 disease. However, the superiority of CCRT + AC was only observed in LRRFS (HR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.79, P = 0.010) for the T4 subgroup.

CONCLUSION

IC + CCRT should be strongly considered by patients with LANPC, especially those with T3 or N2 disease.

摘要

目的

探讨诱导化疗(IC)联合同期放化疗(CCRT)与 CCRT 联合辅助化疗(AC)在局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)中的作用。

材料与方法

采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)法平衡变量。采用 Cox 回归分析确定独立预后因素,并比较不同亚组患者两种化疗治疗组合的结局。

结果

通过 1:2 的 PSM 共选择了 550 例患者。匹配数据集中的生存结果表明,IC+CCRT 组 5 年总生存率(OS;89.3% vs 85.3%,P=0.119)、无失败生存率(FFS;80.2% vs 79.0%,P=0.722)和无远处转移生存率(DMFS;87.4% vs 84.4%,P=0.322)均高于 CCRT+AC,但差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,IC+CCRT 与 OS(风险比[HR]2.68,95%置信区间[CI]1.16-6.22,P=0.017)、FFS(HR 1.94,95%CI 1.06-3.57,P=0.029)和局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS;HR 2.63,95%CI 1.04-6.68,P=0.034)显著改善相关。此外,这种治疗组合可显著延长 T3 疾病患者的 OS(HR 3.72,95%CI 1.41-9.80,P=0.004)。然而,CCRT+AC 的优势仅在 T4 亚组的 LRRFS 中观察到(HR 0.18,95%CI 0.04-0.79,P=0.010)。

结论

对于 LANPC 患者,尤其是 T3 或 N2 疾病患者,应强烈考虑 IC+CCRT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验