• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除类型是腹腔镜部分肝切除术后并发症的预测因素。

Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-0001, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9054-9063. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x
PMID:35831677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a procedure that can have varying levels of surgical difficulty depending on the tumor status and procedure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of partial LLR using a new resection classification system.

METHODS

From January 2009 to May 2021, 156 patients underwent LLR; of them, 87 patients who underwent pure partial LLR were included in this study. They were classified according to the IWATE criteria as the low (n = 56) and intermediate (n = 31) difficulty groups and reclassified according to the resection type as the edge (ER, n = 45), bowl-shaped (BSR, n = 27), and dome-shaped resection (DSR, n = 15) groups. The following surgical outcomes were comparatively analyzed among the groups: intraoperative blood loss, the operation time, and complication rates. Preoperative risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the IWATE criteria-based analysis, the intermediate-difficulty group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.005), operation time (p = 0.005), and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade-based complication rates (CD grade 2 or higher, p = 0.03) than the low-difficulty group. When analyzing the resection type, the CD grade-based complication rate (p = 0.013) and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.005) were significantly higher and the postoperative hospitalization was significantly longer (p = 0.028) in the bowl-shaped resection (BSR) group than in the edge- (ER) and dome-shaped resection (DSR) groups. The tumor size (p = 0.011) and IWATE criteria score (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion in the multivariate analysis. The tumor depth (p = 0.011) and BSR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for complications of CD grade 2 or higher in the multivariate analysis. BSR was an independent risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection type could predict the rate of postoperative complications, while the IWATE criteria could predict the intraoperative surgical difficulty.

摘要

背景

部分腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)是一种手术,其手术难度可能因肿瘤状况和手术方式而有所不同。因此,我们旨在使用新的切除分类系统评估部分 LLR 的手术结果。

方法

从 2009 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月,有 156 名患者接受了 LLR;其中,87 名接受纯部分 LLR 的患者被纳入本研究。根据岩手标准,他们被分为低(n=56)和中(n=31)难度组,并根据切除类型重新分类为边缘(ER,n=45)、碗形(BSR,n=27)和穹顶形(DSR,n=15)切除组。比较分析各组之间的术中出血量、手术时间和并发症发生率。评估术中输血和并发症的术前危险因素。

结果

在岩手标准基础分析中,中难度组的术中出血量(p=0.005)、手术时间(p=0.005)和 Clavien-Dindo(CD)分级相关并发症发生率(CD 分级 2 级或以上,p=0.03)均明显高于低难度组。当分析切除类型时,BSR 组的 CD 分级相关并发症发生率(p=0.013)和手术部位感染(SSI,p=0.005)显著升高,术后住院时间明显延长(p=0.028)。与边缘(ER)和穹顶形(DSR)切除组相比。多变量分析显示,肿瘤大小(p=0.011)和岩手标准评分(p=0.006)是术中输血的独立危险因素。肿瘤深度(p=0.011)和 BSR(p=0.002)是 CD 分级 2 级或以上并发症的独立危险因素。BSR 是 SSI 的独立危险因素多变量分析(p=0.017)。

结论

切除类型可以预测术后并发症的发生率,而岩手标准可以预测术中手术难度。

相似文献

1
Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.切除类型是腹腔镜部分肝切除术后并发症的预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9054-9063. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Based on the IWATE criteria: to investigate the influence of different surgical approaches on the perioperative outcomes of hepatectomy.基于岩手标准:探讨不同手术方式对肝切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1044-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09563-6. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.不同腹腔镜肝切除术困难评分系统用于肝细胞癌的外部验证。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3732-3749. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08687-5. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
Laparoscopic Liver Resection Procedure Attenuates Organ-space Surgical Site Infection Compared With Open Procedure: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹手术相比,可减轻器官间隙手术部位感染:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Anticancer Res. 2023 May;43(5):2273-2280. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16391.
5
Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.在北美一个单一队列中验证岩手县标准作为腹腔镜肝切除难度评分的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3601-3609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.术前M2BPGi评分可预测腹腔镜肝切除术中的手术难度及术后并发症的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1262-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09664-2. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Predictive risk factors for resection surface-related complications after laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal tumor and synchronous liver metastases: a single-center retrospective study.腹腔镜同期切除原发结直肠肿瘤和同步肝转移术后与切除面相关并发症的预测性危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5006-5016. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10964-y. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
8
Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中难度评分系统DSS-B和DSS-ER的临床实用性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):12-18. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0150. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.腹腔镜肝手术的复杂性和并发症预测:100 例连续腹腔镜肝切除术中 Halls 评分与岩手评分的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jul;27(7):380-387. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.731. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery.腹腔镜肝手术难度评分系统的机器学习分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8869-8880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09322-7. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors for 30-day mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver resection.接受肝切除术的肝细胞癌患者30天死亡率的预测因素。
Narra J. 2024 Dec;4(3):e1001. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1001. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Validation of the IWATE Criteria in Robotic-Assisted Liver Resections.岩手标准在机器人辅助肝切除术中的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 May 3;13(9):2697. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092697.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of blood transfusion rates during liver resection by country.按国家对肝切除术中输血率进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Proposal for a revised system for classifying difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection.腹腔镜部分肝切除术难度分类修订系统的建议。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1533-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02253-2. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.在北美一个单一队列中验证岩手县标准作为腹腔镜肝切除难度评分的有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3601-3609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Laparoscopic resection reduces superficial surgical site infection in liver surgery.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Dec;105(6):404-416. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.404. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
腹腔镜切除术可降低肝脏手术中表浅手术部位感染的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7131-7141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08233-9. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00930-3. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
5
Curative Surgery and Ki-67 Value Rather Than Tumor Differentiation Predict the Survival of Patients With High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Ki-67 价值而非根治性手术预测高级神经内分泌肿瘤患者的生存。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e108-e113. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004495. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Short-term Outcomes of "Difficult" Laparoscopic Liver Resection at Specialized Centers: Report From INSTALL (International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection)-2 on 4478 Patients."困难"腹腔镜肝切除术在专科中心的短期结果:INSTALL(腹腔镜肝切除术技术方面的国际调查)-2 对 4478 例患者的报告。
Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):940-946. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004434. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Risk-adjusted benchmarks in laparoscopic liver surgery in a national cohort.全国队列中腹腔镜肝手术的风险调整基准
Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):845-853. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11404. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.基于指数的 IWATE 标准作为腹腔镜肝切除术改良难度评分系统的验证。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.腹腔镜肝切除术难度评分系统的验证:日本内镜肝脏外科学术研究组的多中心分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):249-258.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification.腹腔镜肝切除术的难度:一种新分类法的提议
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):13-17. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002176.