• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝切除术难度评分系统的验证:日本内镜肝脏外科学术研究组的多中心分析

Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.

作者信息

Tanaka Shogo, Kubo Shoji, Kanazawa Akishige, Takeda Yutaka, Hirokawa Fumitoshi, Nitta Hiroyuki, Nakajima Takayoshi, Kaizu Takashi, Kaneko Hironori, Wakabayashi Go

机构信息

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):249-258.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016
PMID:28408311
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is widely used for hepatic disease treatment. Preoperative prediction of operative difficulty can be beneficial as a roadmap for surgeons advancing from simple to highly technical LLR. We performed a multicenter analysis to investigate a "difficulty scoring system" for predicting the difficulty of LLR.

STUDY DESIGN

The proposed "difficulty scoring system" includes 3 difficulty levels based on 5 factors. The system was validated in a cohort of 2,199 patients who underwent LLR at 74 Japanese centers between 2010 and 2014; the difficulty level was rated as low (n = 965), intermediate (n = 891), and high (n = 343). Operative parameters, postoperative complications, and outcomes were compared according to the difficulty levels.

RESULTS

The median operation time and blood loss were 258 minutes (range 30 to 1,275 minutes) and 75 mL (range 0 to 7,798 mL), respectively. The overall conversion rate was 5.0% (n = 110). The incidences of postoperative complications, liver failure, and in-hospital death were 5.3% (n = 116), 1.5% (n = 32), and 0.5% (n = 12), respectively. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range 1 to 189 days). Conversion rate, operation time, and blood loss showed a direct correlation with the difficulty level. A strong correlation was observed among the difficulty level, incidence of postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Incidence of postoperative liver failure and in-hospital death in the high difficulty group was higher than that in the low difficulty group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative evaluation with the "difficulty scoring system" predicted the difficulty of the operation and the postoperative outcomes of LLR. In the beginning of LLR training, surgeons should start with low difficulty-level operations.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)广泛应用于肝脏疾病的治疗。术前预测手术难度有助于为外科医生从简单的LLR手术向高难度手术进阶提供路线图。我们进行了一项多中心分析,以研究一种用于预测LLR手术难度的“难度评分系统”。

研究设计

所提出的“难度评分系统”基于5个因素分为3个难度级别。该系统在2010年至2014年间于日本74个中心接受LLR手术的2199例患者队列中进行了验证;难度级别分为低(n = 965)、中(n = 891)和高(n = 343)。根据难度级别比较手术参数、术后并发症和结局。

结果

中位手术时间和失血量分别为258分钟(范围30至1275分钟)和75毫升(范围0至7798毫升)。总体中转率为5.0%(n = 110)。术后并发症、肝衰竭和住院死亡的发生率分别为5.3%(n = 116)、1.5%(n = 32)和0.5%(n = 12)。中位住院时间为9天(范围1至189天)。中转率、手术时间和失血量与难度级别呈直接相关。在难度级别、术后并发症发生率和住院时间之间观察到强相关性。高难度组术后肝衰竭和住院死亡的发生率高于低难度组。

结论

使用“难度评分系统”进行术前评估可预测LLR手术的难度和术后结局。在LLR培训初期,外科医生应从低难度级别的手术开始。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.腹腔镜肝切除术难度评分系统的验证:日本内镜肝脏外科学术研究组的多中心分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):249-258.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中难度评分系统DSS-B和DSS-ER的临床实用性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):12-18. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0150. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
3
Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection.预测腹腔镜肝切除手术时间的难度评分系统的临床应用价值。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Sep;26(9):702-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0135. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis.验证一种用于肝胆管结石病腹腔镜肝切除术的难度评分系统。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1148-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07479-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Lesions Adjacent to Major Vessels: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗靠近大血管病变的倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):1002-1008. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0326. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
6
Laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a North-African single center.腹腔镜肝切除术:北非单中心的初步经验
Tunis Med. 2015 Aug-Sep;93(8-9):523-6.
7
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
8
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty.一种用于预测纯腹腔镜肝切除术手术难度的新模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5356-5363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.定义手术难度预测腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的手术结局。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5209-5218. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5589-7. Epub 2017 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: a propensity score-matching study.微创与开放肝切除术治疗伴微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3492-3503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11717-1. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of robotic-assisted hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术的成本效益和临床影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 14;19(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02319-z.
3
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) in difficult laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.
吲哚菁绿荧光成像(ICG-FI)在困难的肝细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3400-3411. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11707-3. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification is associated with postoperative portal vein thrombosis in laparoscopic liver resection.蒙苏里互助会分类与腹腔镜肝切除术后门静脉血栓形成有关。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1924-1934. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11558-y. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and the Impact on Long-Term Survival: A Population-Based National Cohort Study.结直肠肝转移切除术后并发症的危险因素及其对长期生存的影响:一项基于人群的全国队列研究。
World J Surg. 2023 Sep;47(9):2230-2240. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07043-z. Epub 2023 May 20.
6
Positioning of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Laparoscopic to Robot-Assisted Liver Resection.肝细胞癌微创肝脏手术的定位:从腹腔镜肝脏切除到机器人辅助肝脏切除
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):488. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020488.
7
Surgical Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Class B: a Retrospective Multicenter Study.Child-Pugh B级患者肝细胞癌的手术结局:一项回顾性多中心研究
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):283-295. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05549-w. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Temperature-controlled laser thermal therapy system using a newly developed laparoscopic system equipped with an ultra-compact thermographic camera.采用新型腹腔镜系统和超小型热成像摄像机的控温激光热疗系统。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22908-4.
9
Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.切除类型是腹腔镜部分肝切除术后并发症的预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9054-9063. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Establishment and Application of a Novel Difficulty Scoring System for da Vinci Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy.一种新型达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠切除术难度评分系统的建立与应用
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 1;9:916014. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916014. eCollection 2022.