Franz I W
Herz. 1987 Apr;12(2):99-109.
Blood pressure, the central parameter in the diagnosis of arterial hypertension, is subject to a high degree of variability. The dilemma for the evaluating physician is that he has no true value for the resting blood pressure that is both comparable and reproducible. Reproducibility, however, is an essential requirement for all diagnostic procedures in medicine. A standardized ergometric procedure (at workloads of 50 to 100 watts [W]; incremented 10 watts/min; cuff blood pressure measurements) is suitable to obtain comparable, reproducible monitoring of the blood pressure response in both pressure response in both normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. The blood pressure behavior during and after ergometric exercise was investigated in 552 males in order to clarify if this standardized procedure is suitable for differentiating between normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. The following normal upper limits for blood pressure values in men and women between the ages of 20 and 50 years of 200/100 mmHg (mean + 1 SD) at a workload of 100 W as well as 140/90 mmHg in the fifth minute of the recovery phase were obtained. Patients suffering from mild hypertension showed significantly (p less than 0.001) higher blood pressures (213 +/- 22/116 +/- 11 mmHg) at 100 W and after exercise than age-matched normotensives (188 +/- 14/92 +/- 9 mmHg) but significantly (p less than 0.001) lower values than hypertensives with stable hypertension (225 +/- 22/126 +/- 11 mmHg). Moreover, the systolic pressure response to ergometric work was significantly (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.01) influenced by age. Using the normal upper limits for blood pressure during and after ergometry, the ergometric procedure revealed that 50% of the patients with borderline hypertension at rest could be classified as hypertensives. Their blood pressure response at 100 W (216 +/- 21/113 +/- 8 mmHg) did not significantly differ from the patients with mild hypertension. In contrast, in the 50% who reacted negatively to ergometric testing, the systolic blood pressure response at 100 W (204 +/- 18 mmHg) was significantly (p less than 0.01) lower than that of those who demonstrated a positive reaction, revealing exactly the same diastolic blood pressure value of 92 mmHg as the normotensives. Follow-up examinations several years (average 3.8 years) subsequently showed that 97% of the ergometric-positive borderline hypertensives developed established hypertension. Thus an early diagnosis of arterial hypertension was achieved years before its established manifestation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
血压作为动脉高血压诊断的核心参数,具有高度的变异性。评估医生面临的困境在于,他没有一个既具有可比性又可重复的静息血压真实值。然而,可重复性是医学中所有诊断程序的一项基本要求。一种标准化的测力程序(工作负荷为50至100瓦[W];以每分钟10瓦递增;袖带血压测量)适用于对正常血压受试者和高血压患者的血压反应进行可比的、可重复的监测。为了明确这种标准化程序是否适用于区分正常血压受试者和高血压患者,对552名男性在测力运动期间及之后的血压行为进行了研究。得出了20至50岁男性和女性在100瓦工作负荷时血压值的正常上限为200/100 mmHg(均值 + 1标准差),以及恢复阶段第5分钟时为140/90 mmHg。轻度高血压患者在100瓦时及运动后的血压(213±22/116±11 mmHg)显著高于(p小于0.001)年龄匹配的正常血压者(188±14/92±9 mmHg),但显著低于(p小于0.001)患有稳定高血压的患者(225±22/126±11 mmHg)。此外,测力运动时的收缩压反应受年龄显著影响(p小于0.05至p小于0.01)。使用测力运动期间及之后的血压正常上限,测力程序显示,50%静息时处于临界高血压的患者可被归类为高血压患者。他们在100瓦时的血压反应(216±21/113±8 mmHg)与轻度高血压患者无显著差异。相比之下,在对测力测试反应为阴性的50%患者中,100瓦时的收缩压反应(204±18 mmHg)显著低于(p小于0.01)呈阳性反应的患者,其舒张压值与正常血压者完全相同,均为92 mmHg。随后数年(平均3.8年)的随访检查显示,97%测力呈阳性的临界高血压患者发展为确诊高血压。因此,在动脉高血压确诊表现出现数年之前就实现了早期诊断。(摘要截选至400字)