Suppr超能文献

使用液压系统技术进行脂肪处理以优化脂肪移植:时间和成本分析

Optimizing Fat Grafting Using a Hydraulic System Technique for Fat Processing: A Time and Cost Analysis.

作者信息

Verdura Vincenzo, Guastafierro Antonio, Di Pace Bruno, Faenza Mario, Nicoletti Giovanni Francesco, Rubino Corrado

机构信息

Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy.

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana," PhD School of Translational Medicine of Development and Active Aging, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 6;49(2):266-274. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744361. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Many authors have researched ways to optimize fat grafting by looking for a technique that offers safe and long-term fat survival rate. To date, there is no standardized protocol. We designed a "hydraulic system technique" optimizing the relationship among the quantity of injected fat, operative time, and material cost to establish fat volume cutoffs for a single procedure.  Thirty-six patients underwent fat grafting surgery and were organized into three groups according to material used: standard, "1-track," and "2-tracks" systems. The amount of harvested and grafted fat as well as material used for each procedure was collected. Operating times were recorded and statistical analysis was performed to establish the relationship with the amount of treated fat.  In 15 cases the standard system was used (mean treated fat 72 [30-100] mL, mean cost 4.23 ± 0.27 euros), in 11 cases the "1-track" system (mean treated fat 183.3 [120-280] mL, mean cost 7.63 ± 0.6 euros), and in 10 cases the "2-tracks" one (mean treated fat 311[220-550] mL, mean cost 12.47 ± 1 euros). The mean time difference between the standard system and the "1-track" system is statistically significant starting from three fat syringes (90 mL) in 17.66 versus 6.87 minutes. The difference between the "1-track" system and "2-tracks" system becomes statistically significant from 240 mL of fat in 15 minutes ("1-track") versus 9.3 minutes for the "2-tracks" system.  Data analysis would indicate the use of the standard system, "1-track," and "2-tracks" to treat an amount of fat < 90 mL of fat, 90 ÷ 240 mL of fat, and ≥ 240 mL of fat, respectively.

摘要

许多作者通过寻找一种能提供安全且长期脂肪存活率的技术来研究优化脂肪移植的方法。迄今为止,尚无标准化方案。我们设计了一种“液压系统技术”,优化注射脂肪量、手术时间和材料成本之间的关系,以确定单次手术的脂肪量上限。

36例患者接受了脂肪移植手术,并根据所用材料分为三组:标准组、“单通道”组和“双通道”组。收集了每次手术采集和移植的脂肪量以及所用材料。记录手术时间并进行统计分析,以确定其与治疗脂肪量的关系。

15例使用标准系统(平均治疗脂肪量72 [30 - 100] mL,平均成本4.23 ± 0.27欧元),11例使用“单通道”系统(平均治疗脂肪量183.3 [120 - 280] mL,平均成本7.63 ± 0.6欧元),10例使用“双通道”系统(平均治疗脂肪量311[220 - 550] mL,平均成本12.47 ± 1欧元)。从三个脂肪注射器(90 mL)开始,标准系统和“单通道”系统之间的平均时间差具有统计学意义,分别为17.66分钟和6.87分钟。“单通道”系统和“双通道”系统之间的差异从240 mL脂肪开始具有统计学意义,“单通道”系统为15分钟,“双通道”系统为9.3分钟。

数据分析表明,标准系统、“单通道”系统和“双通道”系统分别用于治疗脂肪量<90 mL、90÷240 mL和≥240 mL的脂肪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea89/9045492/53c82a0cd6b4/10-1055-s-0042-1744361-i20350-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验