Suppr超能文献

接受长期药物治疗的不同糖尿病大鼠模型中曲线下面积的比较。

Comparison of area under the curve in various models of diabetic rats receiving chronic medication.

作者信息

Liu Keng-Fan, Niu Chiang-Shan, Tsai Jen-Chieh, Yang Chao-Lin, Peng Wen-Huang, Niu Ho-Shan

机构信息

School of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine Resources, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2020 Jan 7;18(4):1078-1087. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.91471. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is widely used as a diagnostic tool for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in clinical settings and animal experiments. The area under the curve (AUC) is then developed to quantify the total increase in blood glucose during the OGTT. Similarly, attenuation of the increased AUC indicates the improvement of IGT in animals. Variations in fasting plasma glucose between individuals stimulate the development of incremental area under the curve (iAUC). However, the iAUC determined from subtracting the baseline value of fasting plasma glucose (similar to ΔAUC) has been challenged as problematic without evidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We developed four different diabetic animal models. In each model, rats were treated with metformin, dapagliflozin, and insulin respectively for 1 week. OGTTs were performed after 7 days of the drug treatment. The acute blood glucose changes induced by one-time treatment of drugs were also compared.

RESULTS

After a daily application of each drug at an effective dose for 7 days, results indicated potency in the following order: insulin > dapagliflozin > metformin. This was determined by calculation using the AUC in all diabetic models. However, the order changed when using the calculation with iAUC. Additionally, signals were changed before the OGTT in each model that received repeated treatment of each drug. Notably, drug potency was shown to be the same in OGTT calculated from iAUC and AUC in diabetic rats receiving acute treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

iAUC seems unsuitable for application in cases where subjects are receiving chronic medication(s).

摘要

引言

口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)在临床环境和动物实验中被广泛用作诊断糖耐量受损(IGT)的工具。随后,曲线下面积(AUC)被用于量化OGTT期间血糖的总升高。同样,AUC升高的减弱表明动物IGT的改善。个体间空腹血糖的差异促使了曲线下增量面积(iAUC)的发展。然而,通过减去空腹血糖基线值确定的iAUC(类似于ΔAUC)被质疑存在问题,但却缺乏证据。

材料与方法

我们建立了四种不同的糖尿病动物模型。在每个模型中,大鼠分别接受二甲双胍、达格列净和胰岛素治疗1周。药物治疗7天后进行OGTT。还比较了一次性药物治疗引起的急性血糖变化。

结果

每天以有效剂量应用每种药物7天后,结果表明效力顺序如下:胰岛素>达格列净>二甲双胍。这是通过计算所有糖尿病模型中的AUC确定的。然而,使用iAUC计算时顺序发生了变化。此外,在每个接受每种药物重复治疗的模型中,OGTT前的信号发生了变化。值得注意的是,在接受急性治疗的糖尿病大鼠中,根据iAUC和AUC计算的OGTT中显示药物效力相同。

结论

iAUC似乎不适用于受试者正在接受慢性药物治疗的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e65d/9266878/6e38e390ead2/AMS-18-4-113624-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验