Suppr超能文献

24 小时重度能量限制可损害年轻、瘦男性进餐后血糖控制。

24-h severe energy restriction impairs postprandial glycaemic control in young, lean males.

机构信息

1National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine,School of Sport,Exercise and Health Sciences,Loughborough University,Loughborough,LeicestershireLE11 3TU,UK.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 2018 Nov;120(10):1107-1116. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518002568.

Abstract

Intermittent energy restriction (IER) involves short periods of severe energy restriction interspersed with periods of adequate energy intake, and can induce weight loss. Insulin sensitivity is impaired by short-term, complete energy restriction, but the effects of IER are not well known. In randomised order, fourteen lean men (age: 25 (sd 4) years; BMI: 24 (sd 2) kg/m2; body fat: 17 (4) %) consumed 24-h diets providing 100 % (10 441 (sd 812) kJ; energy balance (EB)) or 25 % (2622 (sd 204) kJ; energy restriction (ER)) of estimated energy requirements, followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 75 g of glucose drink) after fasting overnight. Plasma/serum glucose, insulin, NEFA, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) were assessed before and after (0 h) each 24-h dietary intervention, and throughout the 2-h OGTT. Homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) assessed the fasted response and incremental AUC (iAUC) or total AUC (tAUC) were calculated during the OGTT. At 0 h, HOMA2-IR was 23 % lower after ER compared with EB (P<0·05). During the OGTT, serum glucose iAUC (P<0·001), serum insulin iAUC (P<0·05) and plasma NEFA tAUC (P<0·01) were greater during ER, but GLP-1 (P=0·161), GIP (P=0·473) and FGF21 (P=0·497) tAUC were similar between trials. These results demonstrate that severe energy restriction acutely impairs postprandial glycaemic control in lean men, despite reducing HOMA2-IR. Chronic intervention studies are required to elucidate the long-term effects of IER on indices of insulin sensitivity, particularly in the absence of weight loss.

摘要

间歇性能量限制(IER)涉及短期严重的能量限制与充足能量摄入的时期交替进行,可以诱导体重减轻。短期完全能量限制会损害胰岛素敏感性,但 IER 的影响尚不清楚。14 名精瘦男性(年龄:25(4)岁;BMI:24(2)kg/m2;体脂肪:17(4)%)按随机顺序分别摄入 24 小时提供 100%(10441(812)kJ;能量平衡(EB))或 25%(2622(204)kJ;能量限制(ER))估计能量需求的饮食,然后在禁食过夜后进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT;75g 葡萄糖饮料)。在每个 24 小时饮食干预前后(0h)和整个 2 小时 OGTT 期间评估血浆/血清葡萄糖、胰岛素、NEFA、胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)、葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素释放肽(GIP)和成纤维细胞生长因子 21(FGF21)。稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA2-IR)评估了禁食时的反应和增量 AUC(iAUC)或总 AUC(tAUC)在 OGTT 期间进行了计算。在 0h,ER 后与 EB 相比,HOMA2-IR 降低了 23%(P<0·05)。在 OGTT 期间,ER 时血清葡萄糖 iAUC(P<0·001)、血清胰岛素 iAUC(P<0·05)和血浆 NEFA tAUC(P<0·01)更大,但 GLP-1(P=0·161)、GIP(P=0·473)和 FGF21(P=0·497)tAUC 两次试验之间无差异。这些结果表明,尽管降低了 HOMA2-IR,但严重的能量限制会急性损害精瘦男性的餐后血糖控制。需要进行慢性干预研究来阐明 IER 对胰岛素敏感性指标的长期影响,特别是在没有体重减轻的情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验