Jiang Shan, Qian Yi-Ming, Jiang Yuan, Cao Zi-Qin, Xin Bing-Mu, Wang Ying-Chun, Wu Bin
Department of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
China Astronaut Research and Training Center, Beijing, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 27;13:730820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.730820. eCollection 2022.
Previous researchers have found that head-down bed rest (HDBR) will affect the emotional state of individuals, and negative emotions such as anxiety are closely related to attention bias. The present study adopted the dot-probe task to evaluate the effects of 15-days of -6° HDBR on the attention bias of threatening stimulus in 17 young men, which was completed before (Pre-HDBR), during (HDBR-1, HDBR-8, HDBR-15), after (Post-HDBR) the bed rest. In addition, self-report inventories (State Anxiety Inventory, SAI; Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale, PANAS) were conducted to record emotional changes. The results showed that the participants' negative affect scores on HDBR-8 were significantly lower than the HDBR-1 in PANAS while there was no significant difference on positive affect scores and anxiety scores in SAI. And the results showed that at the Pre-HDBR, HDBT-1, HDBR-15, Post-HDBR, the response speed to threatening stimulus was faster than neutral stimulus, but no statistical significance. However, reaction time of threatening stimulus is significantly longer than neutral stimulus in the HDBR-8, indicating that HDBR may have an effect on the participants' attention bias, and this effect is manifested as attention avoidance.
先前的研究人员发现,头低位卧床休息(HDBR)会影响个体的情绪状态,而焦虑等负面情绪与注意力偏向密切相关。本研究采用点探测任务,评估了17名年轻男性在-6°头低位卧床休息15天期间,于卧床休息前(HDBR前)、期间(HDBR-1、HDBR-8、HDBR-15)、之后(HDBR后)对威胁性刺激的注意力偏向的影响。此外,还进行了自我报告量表(状态焦虑量表,SAI;积极情感和消极情感量表,PANAS)来记录情绪变化。结果显示,在PANAS中,参与者在HDBR-8时的消极情感得分显著低于HDBR-1时,而在SAI中的积极情感得分和焦虑得分没有显著差异。并且结果显示,在HDBR前、HDBT-1、HDBR-15、HDBR后,对威胁性刺激的反应速度快于中性刺激,但无统计学意义。然而,在HDBR-8时,威胁性刺激的反应时间显著长于中性刺激,表明HDBR可能对参与者的注意力偏向有影响,且这种影响表现为注意力回避。