Karatuna Işıl, Jönsson Sandra, Muhonen Tuija
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Beykoz University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Urban Studies, Centre for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA), Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 21;13:908640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908640. eCollection 2022.
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has severely affected workers, workplaces, and working practices. In the higher education setting, universities have shifted to distance learning, resulting in profound changes in academics' work. In this study, we aimed to describe academics' job demands and resources related to changes in working conditions during the pandemic, and to examine how these changes have affected the perceived occupational wellbeing of academics. Additionally, we aimed to investigate academics' expectations and concerns for future academic working practices following the pandemic. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 26 academics working at various universities in Sweden. A content analysis was used to identify the key themes from the transcribed interviews. The results indicated that academics experienced a lack of face-to-face communication, absence of an academic environment, work overload, and work-home interference as demanding during the pandemic. In relation to resources, online communication options, appropriate working conditions, organizational-social support, and individual factors were perceived as important. Most respondents perceived negative occupational wellbeing outcomes. However, academics who had the appropriate resources were less likely to be affected by job demands. Academics' expectations for future academic work included continuation of working online, flexibility in the choice of workspace, and strengthened digital capacity. Their concerns were related to a lack of face-to-face interaction, management actions and economic implications, and pure digital education. This paper contributes to the literature by illustrating the complexity and diversity of experiences and preferences among academics that are important for universities to consider when organizing and managing future academic work.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行严重影响了劳动者、工作场所和工作方式。在高等教育领域,大学已转向远程学习,这给学者的工作带来了深刻变化。在本研究中,我们旨在描述学者在疫情期间与工作条件变化相关的工作需求和资源,并探讨这些变化如何影响学者对职业幸福感的认知。此外,我们旨在调查学者对疫情后未来学术工作方式的期望和担忧。通过对瑞典各大学的26位学者进行半结构化访谈收集数据。采用内容分析法从转录的访谈中识别关键主题。结果表明,学者们在疫情期间经历了缺乏面对面交流、学术环境缺失、工作过载以及工作与家庭的干扰等困难。在资源方面,在线交流选项、合适的工作条件、组织社会支持和个人因素被认为很重要。大多数受访者认为职业幸福感有负面结果。然而,拥有适当资源的学者受工作需求影响的可能性较小。学者们对未来学术工作的期望包括继续在线工作、工作空间选择的灵活性以及增强数字能力。他们的担忧与缺乏面对面互动、管理行动和经济影响以及纯粹的数字教育有关。本文通过阐述学者经历和偏好的复杂性与多样性,为相关文献做出了贡献,这些对于大学在组织和管理未来学术工作时具有重要的参考价值。