Suppr超能文献

并非所有学者都一样:学者工作生活质量量表(AQoLW)的首次验证

Not All Academics Are Alike: First Validation of the Academics' Quality of Life at Work Scale (AQoLW).

作者信息

Converso Daniela, Loera Barbara, Molinengo Giorgia, Viotti Sara, Guidetti Gloria

机构信息

Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 3;9:2408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02408. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Relating to the macro-level changes and the increasing complexity of the academic system, a growing number of studies began to investigate the perceived working context impact on well-being and job satisfaction of academics. A unique duality characterizes this context: academics cannot be longer defined as stress-free, but at the same time they are still satisfied and engaged in their work. There is a need to evaluate the academic environment not only in terms of stressor and strain, but also in terms of which experiences are sources of fulfillment. The study aimed to explore psychometric properties of a new instrument (AQoLW) for assessing context-specific features of the academic work and environment that characterized academics' quality of life at work. A 24 item scale was deployed to academics (full, associate, and assistant professors) in a public university in the north of Italy. Items were defined to represent the main academic activities in order to measure if respondents perceived each of it as a challenging or a hindrance demand. The scale was administered online to 1,012 academics, 443 females (48.7%), mean aged 51.1 years ( = 8.2). In order to test three theoretical models underling AQoLW, a training sample was randomly extracted (242 participants) and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A validation sample with the remaining 668 participants was used to test the measurement invariance by role of the best model emerging from the training sample. Model fit demonstrate the goodness of a latent structure composed by five intercorrelated factors (CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.07). Cronbach α of the five subscales was good, ranging from 0.76 to 0.88. The scale overtakes configural invariance, but not strong invariance by role. The scale is able to intercept the mainly dimensions of the academic work that contribute to the quality of life of academics' staff, namely: research and public engagement, didactic work and relationships with students, career development and competition, ordinary obligations, and fund raising. AQoLW is the first tool to evaluate the academic work and its environment, identifying which activities are stressful demands and which are engaging, and promote scholars' satisfaction.

摘要

随着宏观层面的变化以及学术体系日益复杂,越来越多的研究开始调查学术工作环境对学者幸福感和工作满意度的影响。这种工作环境具有一种独特的双重性:学者不再被认为没有压力,但与此同时,他们仍然对工作感到满意并全身心投入其中。有必要不仅从压力源和压力程度方面评估学术环境,还应从哪些经历是满足感来源的角度进行评估。该研究旨在探索一种新工具(学术工作与生活质量量表,AQoLW)的心理测量特性,以评估表征学者工作生活质量的学术工作与环境的特定特征。一个包含24个条目的量表被发放给意大利北部一所公立大学的学者(正教授、副教授和助理教授)。这些条目被定义为代表主要的学术活动,以便衡量受访者是否将其中每一项视为具有挑战性的需求或阻碍性需求。该量表通过在线方式发放给1012名学者,其中443名女性(48.7%),平均年龄51.1岁(标准差 = 8.2)。为了检验支撑AQoLW的三种理论模型,随机抽取了一个训练样本(242名参与者)并使用验证性因子分析(CFA)进行分析。用其余668名参与者组成的验证样本,通过训练样本中得出的最佳模型的角色来检验测量不变性。模型拟合表明由五个相互关联的因子组成的潜在结构良好(比较拟合指数CFI = 0.91,近似误差均方根RMSEA = 0.08,标准化残差均方根SRMR = 0.07)。五个子量表的克朗巴哈α系数良好,范围从0.76到0.88。该量表实现了构型不变性,但未实现按角色的强不变性。该量表能够截取对学者员工生活质量有贡献的学术工作的主要维度,即:研究与公众参与、教学工作以及与学生的关系、职业发展与竞争、日常职责和筹集资金。AQoLW是评估学术工作及其环境的首个工具,可确定哪些活动是压力性需求,哪些是有吸引力的活动,并提升学者的满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b880/6286960/8223d90cbc03/fpsyg-09-02408-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验