Mattogno Pier Paolo, Marciano Filippo, Catalino Michael P, Mattavelli Davide, Cocca Paola, Lopomo Nicola Francesco, Nicolai Piero, Laws Edward R, Witterick Ian, Raza Shaan M, Devaiah Anand K, Lauretti Liverana, Olivi Alessandro, Fontanella Marco M, Gentili Fred, Doglietto Francesco
Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 May 17;83(Suppl 2):e380-e385. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729906. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Different surgical set-ups for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) have been described, but studies on their ergonomics are limited. The aim of this article is to describe present trends in the ergonomics of ETS. A 33-question, web-based survey was sent to North American Skull Base Society members in 2018 and 116 responded to it (16% of all members). Most respondents were from North America (76%), in academic practice (87%), and neurosurgeons (65%); they had more than 5 years of experience in ETS (73%), had received specific training (66%), and performed at least 5 procedures/mo (55%). Mean reported time for standard and complex procedures were 3.7 and 6.3 hours, respectively. The patient's body is usually positioned in a straight, supine position (84%); the head is in a neutral position (46%) or rotated to the side (38%). Most surgeons perform a binostril technique, work with a partner (95%), and operate standing (94%), holding suction (89%) and dissector (83%); sometimes the endoscope is held by the primary surgeon (22-24%). The second surgeon usually holds the endoscope (72%) and irrigation (42%). During tumor removal most surgeons stand on the same side (65-66%). Many respondents report strain at the dorsolumbar (50%) or cervical (26%) level. Almost one-third of surgeons incorporate a pause during surgery to stretch, and approximately half exercise to be fit for surgery; 16% had sought medical attention for ergonomic-related symptoms. Most respondents value ergonomics in ETS. The variability in surgical set-ups and the relatively high report of complaints underline the need for further studies to optimize ergonomics in ETS.
内镜经蝶窦手术(ETS)有不同的手术设置,但关于其人体工程学的研究有限。本文旨在描述ETS人体工程学的当前趋势。
2018年,向北美颅底学会成员发送了一份基于网络的33个问题的调查问卷,116人做出了回应(占所有成员的16%)。大多数受访者来自北美(76%),从事学术工作(87%),是神经外科医生(65%);他们有超过5年的ETS经验(73%),接受过专门培训(66%),每月至少进行5台手术(55%)。
标准手术和复杂手术的平均报告时间分别为3.7小时和6.3小时。患者身体通常处于伸直仰卧位(84%);头部处于中立位(46%)或向一侧旋转(38%)。大多数外科医生采用双侧鼻孔技术,与助手合作(95%),站立手术(9%),手持吸引器(89%)和剥离器(83%);有时主刀医生手持内镜(22%-24%)。第二助手通常手持内镜(72%)和冲洗器(42%)。在切除肿瘤时,大多数外科医生站在同一侧(65%-66%)。许多受访者报告在腰背部(50%)或颈部(26%)有劳损。近三分之一的外科医生在手术中会停下来伸展身体,约一半的医生通过锻炼来适应手术;16%因人体工程学相关症状寻求过医疗帮助。
大多数受访者重视ETS中的人体工程学。手术设置的差异和相对较高的投诉率表明,需要进一步研究以优化ETS中的人体工程学。