Zhou Yuefei, Hei Yue, Soto Jose M, Jin Tao, Jiang Xiaofan, Feng Dongxia, Liu Weiping, Gao Dakuan
Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Medical Center, Texas A&M University, College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 May 31;83(Suppl 2):e291-e297. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726128. eCollection 2022 Jun.
The aim of the study is to summarize and analyze the efficacy of the multilayered skull base reconstruction using in situ bone flap in endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas. A retrospective review of 65 patients who underwent resection of their histopathology confirmed craniopharyngiomas performed at a single institution. Based on the team's understanding and mastery of skull base reconstruction techniques, patients were divided into two groups according to the methods of reconstruction in two periods. First (March 2015 through August 2016), osseous reconstruction was not adopted and served as the control group (34 cases). Second (September 2016 through July 2019), in situ bone flap repair of the skull base (complete osseous reconstruction) served as observation group (31 cases). The length of hospitalization and nasal exudation, bed rest time of hospital discharge, the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, lumbar drainage, and intracranial/pulmonary infections were collected and compared. Compared with the control group, patients in the observation group had obviously less lumbar drainage and CSF leakage ( < 0.05), but had no significant difference in cases of re-operation, meningitis, and pulmonary infection. At the meantime, cases of nasal exudation, bed rest, and hospitalization of the observation group were significantly reduced ( < 0.05) in the observation group. The multilayered reconstruction technique (especially using in situ bone flap, combined with vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap) is a safe and effective method in achieving watertight closure after EEEA, and can significantly reduce the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and facilitate rehabilitation in skull base reconstruction of craniopharyngiomas.
本研究的目的是总结和分析在内镜鼻内入路(EEA)中使用原位骨瓣进行多层颅底重建治疗颅咽管瘤的疗效。
对在单一机构进行组织病理学确诊的颅咽管瘤切除术的65例患者进行回顾性研究。根据团队对颅底重建技术的理解和掌握情况,将患者在两个时期根据重建方法分为两组。第一组(2015年3月至2016年8月),未采用骨性重建,作为对照组(34例)。第二组(2016年9月至2019年7月),采用原位骨瓣修复颅底(完全骨性重建)作为观察组(31例)。收集并比较住院时间、鼻腔渗出情况、出院卧床时间、脑脊液漏发生率、腰大池引流情况以及颅内/肺部感染情况。
与对照组相比,观察组患者的腰大池引流和脑脊液漏明显减少(P<0.05),但在再次手术、脑膜炎和肺部感染病例方面无显著差异。同时,观察组的鼻腔渗出、卧床时间和住院时间均显著减少(P<0.05)。
多层重建技术(尤其是使用原位骨瓣,联合带血管蒂鼻中隔瓣)是EEEA术后实现严密缝合的一种安全有效的方法,可显著降低脑脊液漏的发生率,并有助于颅咽管瘤颅底重建的康复。