• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对药物遗传学例外主义的看法及其对电子健康记录中临床管理的影响。

Perceptions of pharmacogenetic exceptionalism and the implications for clinical management within an electronic health record.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Sep;15(9):2265-2274. doi: 10.1111/cts.13360. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13360
PMID:35833242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9468565/
Abstract

Genetic exceptionalism refers to a concept that genetic information is distinct from other health data and therefore should have additional safety guards in place. The objective of this study was to establish perceptions of pharmacogenetic (PGx) exceptionalism and genetic information privacy and management within the electronic health record (EHR) from individuals who attended a PGx-focused conference. A 47-question survey was distributed to 370 attendees at a PGx conference in September 2020. The survey assessed demographics, professional characteristics, perceptions of PGx exceptionalism, knowledge of genetic laws and regulations, and EHR management of PGx information. Of the 370 participants invited to take the survey, 30% (n = 110) responded. Most respondents were pharmacists with postgraduate training (76.2%, n = 48). When asked whether PGx information was exceptional, 44% of respondents agreed while 32% disagreed. Agreement with PGx exceptionalism was associated most with respondents' lack of familiarity or knowledge with PGx. Over two-thirds (67%) felt that all members of the healthcare team should be able to access their patients' PGx information without restriction in the EHR. This study identified a lack of unanimity in the perception of PGx exceptionalism and the management of PGx information within the EHR across attendees of a PGx conference. Describing the perception of accessibility of PGx information within the EHR is important to ascertain for designing privacy-related technology, institutional management policies, and legal regulations as this area in genetics is increasingly being implemented into clinical care and clinical standards of care need to be established.

摘要

遗传例外主义是指一种观点,即遗传信息与其他健康数据不同,因此应该设置额外的安全防护措施。本研究的目的是从参加以药物遗传学(PGx)为重点的会议的个人中,确定对 PGx 例外主义和遗传信息隐私以及电子健康记录(EHR)管理的看法。在 2020 年 9 月的一次 PGx 会议上,向 370 名与会者分发了一份包含 47 个问题的调查问卷。该调查评估了人口统计学、专业特征、对 PGx 例外主义的看法、遗传法律法规知识以及 EHR 中 PGx 信息的管理。在受邀参加调查的 370 名参与者中,有 30%(n=110)做出了回应。大多数受访者是具有研究生学历的药剂师(76.2%,n=48)。当被问及 PGx 信息是否具有特殊性时,44%的受访者表示同意,而 32%的受访者表示不同意。对 PGx 例外主义的认同与受访者对 PGx 缺乏熟悉度或了解程度最相关。超过三分之二(67%)的人认为,医疗团队的所有成员都应该能够在 EHR 中不受限制地访问患者的 PGx 信息。这项研究发现,在参加 PGx 会议的与会者中,对 PGx 例外主义的看法和 EHR 中 PGx 信息的管理存在不一致。描述 EHR 中 PGx 信息的可访问性的看法对于设计与隐私相关的技术、机构管理政策和法律法规非常重要,因为这一遗传学领域正在越来越多地应用于临床护理,需要建立临床标准。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of pharmacogenetic exceptionalism and the implications for clinical management within an electronic health record.对药物遗传学例外主义的看法及其对电子健康记录中临床管理的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Sep;15(9):2265-2274. doi: 10.1111/cts.13360. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Identifying End Users' Preferences about Structuring Pharmacogenetic Test Orders in an Electronic Health Record System.确定电子健康记录系统中药物基因组学检测订单结构的终端用户偏好。
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Oct;22(10):1264-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.06.015.
3
A nationwide cross-sectional survey of pharmacy students on pharmacogenetic testing in The Netherlands.荷兰针对药学专业学生进行的一项关于药物遗传学检测的全国性横断面调查。
Pharmacogenomics. 2018 Mar;19(4):311-319. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0175. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Pharmacist-Initiated Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic Panel Testing with Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care: Record of PGx Results and Real-World Impact.药剂师主导的初级保健中基于临床决策支持的先发制人药物基因组学检测面板试验:PGx 结果记录和真实世界影响。
Genes (Basel). 2019 May 29;10(6):416. doi: 10.3390/genes10060416.
5
Attitudes toward pharmacogenetics in patients undergoing testing following percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受检测的患者对药物遗传学的态度。
Per Med. 2022 Mar;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.2217/pme-2021-0064. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
6
Pharmacogenetic testing in primary care practice: opinions of physicians, pharmacists and patients.在初级保健实践中进行药物遗传学检测:医生、药剂师和患者的观点。
Pharmacogenomics. 2019 Jun;20(8):589-598. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0004.
7
Perspectives on the Clinical Use of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Late-Life Mental Healthcare: A Survey of the American Association of Geriatric Psychiatry Membership.老年精神卫生保健中药理学基因检测临床应用的观点:美国老年精神病学协会会员调查
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 May;30(5):560-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
8
Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on the implementation of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment in routine clinical practice.医疗服务提供者和患者对在常规临床实践中实施基于药物遗传学的治疗的看法。
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2024 Sep 1;34(7):236-245. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000541. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
9
Providers' perspectives on the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic testing in pediatric patients.提供者对儿科患者药物基因组检测的临床实用性的看法。
Pharmacogenomics. 2021 Apr;22(5):263-274. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0112. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Patient perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing in the community pharmacy setting.患者对社区药房中药物基因组学检测的看法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Apr;17(4):744-749. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulating the Secondary Use of Data for Research: Arguments Against Genetic Exceptionalism.规范研究数据的二次使用:反对基因例外论的论据
Front Genet. 2019 Dec 20;10:1254. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01254. eCollection 2019.
2
Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data.美国、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚的公众中表达遗传特殊主义的人表示,他们更愿意捐献基因组数据。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr;28(4):424-434. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0550-y. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
3
Integrating pharmacogenomics into the electronic health record by implementing genomic indicators.
通过实施基因组指标,将药物基因组学整合到电子健康记录中。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):154-158. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz177.
4
A look into the future? Patients' and health care staff's perception and evaluation of genetic information and the right not to know.展望未来?患者和医护人员对遗传信息的认知和评价,以及拒绝知情权。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 Dec;180(8):576-588. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32751. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.基因组语境主义:转变遗传例外主义的修辞。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jan;19(1):51-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1544304.
6
Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content.基因例外论是否已过保质期?论基因组日记、背景与内容。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jan;19(1):13-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1552038.
7
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.一项关于美国个体对隐私和遗传信息看法的系统性文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. eCollection 2018.
8
UGT1A1 genotype and irinotecan therapy: general review and implementation in routine practice.UGT1A1基因分型与伊立替康治疗:综述及在临床实践中的应用
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;29(3):219-37. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12117. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
Naked bodies, naked genomes: the special (but not exceptional) nature of genomic information.裸身,裸基因组:基因组信息的特殊(但非例外)性质。
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):331-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.111. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
10
Clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics: overcoming genetic exceptionalism.药物基因组学的临床应用:克服基因例外论
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):507-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70097-8. Epub 2010 Apr 21.