Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. eCollection 2018.
Concerns about genetic privacy affect individuals' willingness to accept genetic testing in clinical care and to participate in genomics research. To learn what is already known about these views, we conducted a systematic review, which ultimately analyzed 53 studies involving the perspectives of 47,974 participants on real or hypothetical privacy issues related to human genetic data. Bibliographic databases included MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Sociological Abstracts. Three investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria and assessed risk of bias. The picture of genetic privacy that emerges from this systematic literature review is complex and riddled with gaps. When asked specifically "are you worried about genetic privacy," the general public, patients, and professionals frequently said yes. In many cases, however, that question was posed poorly or only in the most general terms. While many participants expressed concern that genomic and medical information would be revealed to others, respondents frequently seemed to conflate privacy, confidentiality, control, and security. People varied widely in how much control they wanted over the use of data. They were more concerned about use by employers, insurers, and the government than they were about researchers and commercial entities. In addition, people are often willing to give up some privacy to obtain other goods. Importantly, little attention was paid to understanding the factors-sociocultural, relational, and media-that influence people's opinions and decisions. Future investigations should explore in greater depth which concerns about genetic privacy are most salient to people and the social forces and contexts that influence those perceptions. It is also critical to identify the social practices that will make the collection and use of these data more trustworthy for participants as well as to identify the circumstances that lead people to set aside worries and decide to participate in research.
对遗传隐私的担忧会影响个人在临床护理中接受基因检测和参与基因组学研究的意愿。为了了解人们对这些问题的看法,我们进行了系统评价,最终分析了 53 项研究,这些研究涉及 47974 名参与者对与人类遗传数据相关的真实或假设的隐私问题的看法。文献数据库包括 MEDLINE、Web of Knowledge 和 Sociological Abstracts。三位调查员独立按照预定标准筛选研究,并评估偏倚风险。从这个系统的文献综述中可以看出,遗传隐私的情况是复杂的,并且存在很多空白。当被问到“你是否担心遗传隐私”时,公众、患者和专业人士经常回答“是”。然而,在许多情况下,这个问题被提出得不好,或者只是在最一般的层面上。虽然许多参与者表示担心基因组和医疗信息会被泄露给他人,但受访者似乎经常将隐私、保密性、控制和安全混为一谈。人们对数据的使用控制程度差异很大。他们更担心雇主、保险公司和政府使用数据,而不是研究人员和商业实体。此外,人们往往愿意为了获得其他利益而放弃一些隐私。重要的是,很少有人关注了解影响人们的意见和决定的因素——社会文化、关系和媒体。未来的研究应该更深入地探讨哪些遗传隐私问题对人们来说最为重要,以及影响这些看法的社会力量和背景。确定收集和使用这些数据对参与者更具可信度的社会实践以及确定导致人们放下担忧并决定参与研究的情况也至关重要。