• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《 Reflective Function Questionnaire 在伊朗囚犯中的心理测量特性》

Psychometric Properties of the Reflective Function Questionnaire in Iranian Prisoners.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Nursing, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Mar;68(4):427-438. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221110811. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1177/0306624X221110811
PMID:35833448
Abstract

Reflective functioning is the process of reflecting on the thoughts and feelings of oneself and others and is foundational to healthy human relationships. The 54-item Reflective Function Questionnaire (RFQ) is a self-report measure that assesses reflective functioning, initially developed while studying individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) . The purpose of the present study was to translate the RFQ from English to Persian and evaluate its reliability and validity among Iranian prisoners. The sample of this study included 509 (455 men and 54 women) Iranian prisoners. Findings confirm the translated measure had acceptable face and content validity. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed two dimensions of certainty (RFQ-c) and uncertainty (RFQ-u) of reflective functioning. The correlation analysis showed positive relationships between the dimensions of the RFQ and the borderline personality symptoms questionnaire and the emotional dissatisfaction questionnaire. Correlation analysis also showed negative associations between the dimensions of the RFQ and the Toronto Basic Empathy Scale (BES) and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) questionnaire, confirming the concurrent validity of the RFQ. The Cronbach's alphas of the RFQ-c and RFQ-u subscales were .69 and .7 respectively, which demonstrated relatively acceptable internal consistency. The results of the analysis demonstrated that the translated RFQ had desirable psychometric properties for evaluating reflective function among Iranian prisoners.

摘要

反思功能是一种反思自己和他人的思想和感受的过程,是健康人际关系的基础。54 项反思功能问卷(RFQ)是一种自我报告的衡量标准,用于评估反思功能,最初是在研究边缘型人格障碍(BPD)个体时开发的。本研究的目的是将 RFQ 从英语翻译成波斯语,并评估其在伊朗囚犯中的信度和效度。本研究的样本包括 509 名(455 名男性和 54 名女性)伊朗囚犯。研究结果证实,经翻译的测量工具具有可接受的表面和内容效度。验证性因素分析(CFA)证实了反思功能的确定性(RFQ-c)和不确定性(RFQ-u)两个维度。相关分析显示,RFQ 的维度与边缘型人格症状问卷和情绪不满问卷之间存在正相关关系。相关分析还显示,RFQ 的维度与多伦多基本同理心量表(BES)和肯塔基正念技能问卷(KIMS)之间存在负相关关系,这证实了 RFQ 的同时效度。RFQ-c 和 RFQ-u 分量表的克朗巴赫 α 系数分别为.69 和.7,这表明内部一致性相对可接受。分析结果表明,经翻译的 RFQ 具有评估伊朗囚犯反思功能的理想心理计量学特性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Reflective Function Questionnaire in Iranian Prisoners.《 Reflective Function Questionnaire 在伊朗囚犯中的心理测量特性》
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Mar;68(4):427-438. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221110811. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire.心理化自评量表的编制与验证:反思功能问卷
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678. eCollection 2016.
3
Lessons learned from the adaptation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) for Dutch people with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.从《反思功能问卷》(RFQ)在荷兰轻度至边缘智力障碍人群中的适应性中获得的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 27;18(6):e0287751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287751. eCollection 2023.
4
The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity data for adults and its association with severity of borderline personality disorder.《反思功能问卷》意大利语版:成人效标关联效度及其与边缘型人格障碍严重程度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206433. eCollection 2018.
5
A short version of the reflective functioning questionnaire: Validation in a greek sample.反思功能问卷简表:在希腊样本中的验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 6;19(2):e0298023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298023. eCollection 2024.
6
Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8): One or Two Dimensions?反思功能问卷(RFQ-8)的因子结构研究:单维还是二维?
J Pers Assess. 2022 Nov-Dec;104(6):736-746. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.2014505. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity within a sample of adolescents and associations with psychological problems and alexithymia.《反思功能问卷》的意大利语版本:在青少年样本中的有效性,以及与心理问题和述情障碍的关系。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Apr;78(4):503-516. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23218. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
8
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Greek version of Reflective Functioning Questionnaire.《反思功能问卷》希腊语版本的心理测量特性和因子结构。
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):216-224. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.216.
9
[The German Version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ): A Psychometric Evaluation in the General Population].[反思功能问卷(RFQ)德文版:一般人群中的心理测量学评估]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 Mar;71(3-04):124-131. doi: 10.1055/a-1234-6317. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
The Spanish version of the reflective functioning questionnaire: Validity data in the general population and individuals with personality disorders.反思功能问卷的西班牙语版本:在普通人群和人格障碍个体中的有效性数据。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0274378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274378. eCollection 2023.