Department of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Government Human Services Consulting, Mercer LLC, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1621-1630. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2101819. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) may reduce hospitalizations versus oral formulations (OAP) in bipolar disorder (BP) and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SCZ), but the impact on time to outpatient follow-up is less understood.
To assess hospital readmissions and medical costs among Medicaid beneficiaries with BP or SCZ utilizing OAP or LAI SGAs.
Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses utilized comprehensive administrative claims of Oklahoma Medicaid beneficiaries (≥18 years) with BP or SCZ between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Readmissions, total direct medical costs, and psychiatry-related outpatient visits were assessed via generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates.
Among 2523 included members, LAI utilization was associated with 1.50 and 1.73 times higher odds of any hospitalization and any readmission, respectively ( < .05). Cases involving both BP and SCZ were associated with a 2.40 times higher odds of any readmission, 2.26 times higher number of readmissions, and 24.5% higher costs ( < .001). Of the 468 members with a subsequent psychiatry-related outpatient visit, LAIs were associated with a 23.9% shorter duration to outpatient visit and 16.4% lower costs ( < .05).
In contrast to prior studies, this real-world investigation noted higher hospitalizations and readmissions among LAIs relative to OAP medications, but among members with a hospitalization or ED visit, LAIs were associated with shorter durations to outpatient visits and lower costs. Those with diagnoses of both BP with SCZ had higher odds of any readmission, number of readmissions, and costs relative to those with bipolar disorder alone and may be a key target for interventions.
长效注射抗精神病药(LAls)在双相情感障碍(BP)和精神分裂症/分裂情感障碍(SCZ)中可能比口服制剂(OAP)减少住院治疗,但对门诊随访时间的影响知之甚少。
评估使用 OAP 或 LAI 长效 SGAs 的 BP 或 SCZ 医疗补助受益人的住院再入院和医疗费用。
利用 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间俄克拉荷马州医疗补助受益人的综合行政索赔数据,进行了横断面和纵向分析。通过广义线性模型和广义估计方程,控制人口统计学和临床协变量,评估再入院、总直接医疗费用和精神科门诊就诊。
在 2523 名纳入成员中,LAl 的使用与任何住院和任何再入院的几率分别增加了 1.50 倍和 1.73 倍( < .05)。同时患有 BP 和 SCZ 的病例与任何再入院的几率增加了 2.40 倍,再入院次数增加了 2.26 倍,成本增加了 24.5%( < .001)。在随后有精神科门诊就诊的 468 名成员中,LAls 与门诊就诊的时间缩短了 23.9%,成本降低了 16.4%( < .05)。
与先前的研究相比,这项真实世界的研究发现,与 OAP 药物相比,LAls 导致更高的住院率和再入院率,但在有住院或急诊就诊的患者中,LAls 与门诊就诊时间缩短和成本降低相关。那些同时患有 BP 和 SCZ 的患者与仅患有双相情感障碍的患者相比,再入院、再入院次数和成本的几率更高,可能是干预的关键目标。