Suppr超能文献

南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划精神分裂症受益人与长效注射和口服抗精神病药物的依从性、医疗保健利用率和成本。

Adherence, health care utilization, and costs between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic medications in South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, College of Pharmacy.

University of South Carolina, Columbia; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Titusville, NJ.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jun;30(6):549-559. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the "average treatment effect on the treated" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort ( < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.

摘要

背景

精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍需要长期使用抗精神病药物进行抗精神病治疗,但药物依从性差会导致医疗保健利用率和成本增加。长效注射抗精神病药物 (LAIs) 在治疗方面具有潜在的优势,因为它们需要较少的频繁给药和改善的药物依从性。南卡罗来纳州是美国采用 LAI 最多的州之一,因此它是一个理想的人群,可以比较 LAI 与口服抗精神病药物 (OAPs) 在治疗精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍方面的疗效。

目的

评估 LAI 与 OAPs 相比,在南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人的精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍患者中的药物依从性、医疗资源利用和成本的影响。

方法

纳入了至少有一次 LAI 或 OAP 用药记录的南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人,年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间,至少有两次精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的诊断记录。采用逻辑回归计算倾向评分 (PS),并调整了结局的混杂因素和预测因素。通过使用 PS 加权 t 检验和卡方检验,我们估计了“对治疗的平均治疗效果”。

结果

共有 3531 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 1537 名 (44.5%) 接受 LAI 治疗,1994 名 (56.5%) 接受 OAP 治疗。在 PS 加权分析中,LAI 队列的 365 天固定分母下的天数覆盖率高于 OAP 队列 (69% vs 64%;< 0.0001),治疗期间的药物占有比率更高 (85% vs 80%;< 0.0001),并具有更高的持久性 (82% vs 64%;< 0.0001)。两个队列的住院和急诊就诊次数没有显著差异 (0.28 次住院, = 0.90;3.68 次 vs 2.96 次急诊就诊, = 0.19)。LAI 队列的门诊就诊次数(包括药物管理就诊次数)多于 OAP 队列(23.1 [SD 24.2] vs 16.9 [SD 21.2];< 0.0001);然而,包括药物管理就诊费用在内,LAI 队列的门诊费用(每位成员)约低 2500 美元(< 0.0001)。OAP 队列的药房就诊次数更多(LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; = 0.006)。LAI 队列的总费用高于 OAP 队列(LAI 26025 美元 [SD 29909 美元] vs OAP 17291 美元 [SD 25261 美元];< 0.0001),这主要是由于药物成本的差异(LAI 15273 美元 [SD 16183 美元] vs OAP 4696 美元 [SD 10371 美元];< 0.0001)。

结论

在南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人中,精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍使用 LAI 治疗与更高的药物依从率相关。使用 LAI 的患者药物成本和总费用较高,但与使用 OAP 的患者相比,门诊和总非药物费用较低。

相似文献

7
Time to Treatment Discontinuation in German Patients with Schizophrenia: Long-Acting Injectables versus Oral Antipsychotics.
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jan;41(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00990-8. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

8
New-user and prevalent-user designs and the definition of study time origin in pharmacoepidemiology: A review of reporting practices.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):960-974. doi: 10.1002/pds.5258. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
Current and emerging long-acting antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;20(7):771-790. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1910674. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验