John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1452, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1563-1572. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02194-4. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
In areas without convenient access to dermatology care, primary care providers (PCPs) serve as an important patient resource for early skin cancer detection. To determine the most effective strategy for skin cancer detection training in PCPs, we conducted a systematic review of educational interventions and performed a meta-analysis on sensitivity and specificity outcomes in PCPs.
To summarize data on skin cancer sensitivity and specificity outcomes for PCP-targeted training programs and diagnostic algorithms. Our PCP cohort included practicing physicians, trainee physicians, and advanced practice practitioners.
A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant English-language articles published worldwide from 2000 onward. Results were screened for eligibility, and overlapping datasets were reconciled. Data extracted included the educational intervention, diagnostic algorithm, and outcomes of interest (sensitivity and specificity). Outcomes were pooled across interventions that taught the same diagnostic algorithm. A bivariate model was fit to compare different interventions/algorithms. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines.
In total, 21 articles were included in this review, encompassing over 58,610 assessments of skin lesions by about 1529 participants worldwide. Training programs that implemented the triage-amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) demonstrated high pooled sensitivity (91.7%) and high pooled specificity (81.4%) among PCPs.
Overall, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that dermoscopy training in PCPs was generally associated with gains in skin cancer sensitivity without loss of specificity. Clinically, this correlates with fewer skin cancers overlooked by PCPs and fewer excisions of benign lesions.
在无法便捷获得皮肤病学护理的地区,初级保健提供者(PCP)是早期皮肤癌检测的重要患者资源。为了确定 PCP 皮肤癌检测培训的最有效策略,我们对教育干预措施进行了系统评价,并对 PCP 的敏感性和特异性结果进行了荟萃分析。
总结针对 PCP 的培训计划和诊断算法的皮肤癌敏感性和特异性结果数据。我们的 PCP 队列包括执业医师、受训医师和高级实践从业者。
在 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中,对 2000 年以来全球发表的相关英文文章进行了文献检索。筛选结果以确定其是否符合入选标准,并协调重叠的数据集。提取的数据包括教育干预、诊断算法和感兴趣的结果(敏感性和特异性)。对教授相同诊断算法的干预措施进行汇总。采用双变量模型比较不同的干预措施/算法。本综述遵循 PRISMA 指南。
共有 21 篇文章纳入本综述,涵盖了来自全球约 1529 名参与者对 58610 多处皮肤病变的评估。实施分诊合并皮肤镜算法(TADA)的培训计划在 PCP 中表现出高的汇总敏感性(91.7%)和高的汇总特异性(81.4%)。
总体而言,这项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,对 PCP 的皮肤镜检查培训通常与皮肤癌敏感性的提高相关,而特异性没有损失。临床上,这与 PCP 忽略的皮肤癌减少和良性病变的切除减少相关。