• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高压下,气泡的寿命延长可能会导致饱和潜水期间内耳减压病。

Extended lifetimes of bubbles at hyperbaric pressure may contribute to inner ear decompression sickness during saturation diving.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Sep 1;133(3):517-523. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00121.2022. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00121.2022
PMID:35834629
Abstract

Inner ear decompression sickness (IEDCS) may occur after upward or downward excursions in saturation diving. Previous studies in nonsaturation diving strongly suggest that IEDCS is caused by arterialization of small venous bubbles across intracardiac or intrapulmonary right-to-left shunts and bubble growth through inward diffusion of supersaturated gas when they arrive in the inner ear. The present study used published saturation diving data and models of inner ear inert gas kinetics and bubble dynamics in arterial conditions to assess whether IEDCS after saturation excursions could also be explained by arterialization of venous bubbles and whether such bubbles might survive longer and be more likely to reach the inner ear under deep saturation diving conditions. Previous data show that saturation excursions produce venous bubbles. Modeling shows that gas supersaturation in the inner ear persists longer than in the brain after such excursions, explaining why the inner ear would be more vulnerable to injury by arriving bubbles. Estimated survival of arterialized bubbles is significantly prolonged at high ambient pressure such that bubbles large enough to be filtered by pulmonary capillaries but able to cross right-to-left shunts are more likely to survive transit to the inner ear than at the surface. IEDCS after saturation excursions is plausibly caused by arterialization of venous bubbles whose prolonged arterial survival at deep depths suggests that larger bubbles in greater numbers reach the inner ear. Inner ear decompression sickness that occurs during deep saturation diving is explained by arterialization of venous bubbles across intracardiac or intrapulmonary right-to-left shunts and growth of these bubbles if they arrive in the inner ear. Bubbles in arterial blood have prolonged lifetimes at hyperbaric pressures compared with at sea level. This can explain why inner ear decompression sickness is more characteristic of rapid decompressions at great depths than of decompression at sea level.

摘要

内耳减压病 (IEDCS) 可能发生在饱和潜水的上升或下降过程中。非饱和潜水的先前研究强烈表明,IEDCS 是由小静脉气泡通过心内或肺内右向左分流的动脉化以及当它们到达内耳时通过过饱和气体的内向扩散而导致的气泡生长引起的。本研究使用已发表的饱和潜水数据和内耳惰性气体动力学和动脉条件下气泡动力学模型来评估饱和潜水后的 IEDCS 是否也可以通过静脉气泡的动脉化来解释,以及这些气泡是否可能存活更长时间,并且在深饱和潜水条件下更有可能到达内耳。先前的数据表明,饱和潜水会产生静脉气泡。模型表明,这种潜水后,内耳中的气体过饱和度比大脑中的过饱和度持续时间更长,这解释了为什么内耳更容易受到到达气泡的伤害。在高环境压力下,动脉化气泡的估计存活时间明显延长,以至于能够通过肺毛细血管过滤但能够穿过右向左分流的大静脉气泡更有可能在到达内耳之前存活下来。饱和潜水后的 IEDCS 很可能是由静脉气泡的动脉化引起的,静脉气泡在深潜时的动脉化存活时间延长,表明更多数量的较大气泡到达内耳。内耳减压病是由心内或肺内右向左分流的静脉气泡动脉化以及这些气泡如果到达内耳而生长引起的。与海平面相比,高压下动脉血液中的气泡具有更长的寿命。这可以解释为什么内耳减压病在深潜时的快速减压比在海平面时更具特征性。

相似文献

1
Extended lifetimes of bubbles at hyperbaric pressure may contribute to inner ear decompression sickness during saturation diving.在高压下,气泡的寿命延长可能会导致饱和潜水期间内耳减压病。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Sep 1;133(3):517-523. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00121.2022. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
DCS or DCI? The difference and why it matters.弥漫性脑肿胀还是弥漫性脑缺血?差异及重要性所在。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Sep 30;49(3):152-153. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.3.152-153.
3
Selective vulnerability of the inner ear to decompression sickness in divers with right-to-left shunt: the role of tissue gas supersaturation.右向左分流潜水员内耳对减压病的选择性易损性:组织气体过饱和的作用。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Jan;106(1):298-301. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90915.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
4
Pathophysiology of inner ear decompression sickness: potential role of the persistent foramen ovale.内耳减压病的病理生理学:卵圆孔未闭的潜在作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Jun;45(2):105-10.
5
Gas micronuclei that underlie decompression bubbles and decompression sickness have not been identified.构成减压气泡和减压病基础的气体微核尚未被识别出来。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Mar 31;49(1):64. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.1.64.
6
Inner-ear decompression sickness: 'hubble-bubble' without brain trouble?内耳减压病:没有脑部问题的“气泡现象”?
Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Jun;45(2):135-6.
7
Decompression sickness in breath-hold diving, and its probable connection to the growth and dissolution of small arterial gas emboli.屏气潜水时的减压病及其与小动脉气体栓子生长和溶解的可能联系。
Math Biosci. 2015 Apr;262:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
Inner ear decompression sickness in compressed-air diving.压缩空气潜水所致内耳减压病
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;39(1):589-94.
9
Risk mitigation in divers with persistent (patent) foramen ovale.卵圆孔未闭潜水员的风险降低
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Jun 30;49(2):77-78. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.2.77-78.
10
Inner ear barotrauma and inner ear decompression sickness: a systematic review on differential diagnostics.内耳气压伤和内耳减压病:鉴别诊断的系统评价。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2021 Dec 20;51(4):328-337. doi: 10.28920/dhm51.4.328-337.

引用本文的文献

1
Decompression illness: a comprehensive overview.减压病:全面概述。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2024 Mar 31;54(1Suppl):1-53. doi: 10.28920/dhm54.1.suppl.1-53.