Bachina Preetham, Lippincott Christopher Kirk, Perry Allison, Munk Elizabeth, Maltas Gina, Bohr Rebecca, Rock Robert Bryan, Shah Maunank
Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 5;6(8):e38247. doi: 10.2196/38247.
In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is standard of care for tuberculosis (TB) treatment adherence monitoring in the US, with increasing use of video-DOT (vDOT). In Minneapolis, vDOT became available in 2019.
In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the use and effectiveness of vDOT in a program setting, including comparison of verified adherence among those receiving vDOT and in-person DOT. We also sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence and technology adoption.
We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals receiving therapy for TB in Minneapolis, MN, between September 2019 and June 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT use and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days per week) verified by observation (in person versus video-DOT), and to compare individuals receiving therapy in the pre-COVID-19 (before March 2020), and post-COVID-19 (after March 2020) periods; within the post-COVID-19 period, we evaluated early COVID-19 (March-August 2020), and intra-COVID-19 (after August 2020) periods.
Among 49 patients with TB (mean age 41, SD 19; n=27, 55% female and n=47, 96% non-US born), 18 (36.7%) received treatment during the post-COVID-19 period. Overall, verified adherence (proportion of observed doses) was significantly higher when using vDOT (mean 81%, SD 17.4) compared to in-person DOT (mean 54.5%, SD 10.9; P=.001). The adoption of vDOT increased significantly from 35% (11/31) of patients with TB in the pre-COVID-19 period to 67% (12/18) in the post-COVID-19 period (P=.04). Consequently, overall verified (ie, observed) adherence among all patients with TB in the clinic improved across the study periods (56%, 67%, and 79%, P=.001 for the pre-, early, and intra-COVID-19 periods, respectively).
vDOT use increased after the COVID-19 period, was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment, and led to overall increased verified adherence in the clinic despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
在美国,亲自直接观察治疗(DOT)是结核病(TB)治疗依从性监测的护理标准,视频直接观察治疗(vDOT)的使用也在增加。在明尼阿波利斯,vDOT于2019年开始可用。
在本文中,我们旨在评估vDOT在项目环境中的使用情况和有效性,包括比较接受vDOT和亲自DOT的患者的核实依从性。我们还试图了解2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对结核病治疗依从性和技术采用的影响。
我们提取了2019年9月至2021年6月期间在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯接受结核病治疗的个体的常规收集数据。我们的主要结果是评估vDOT的使用情况和治疗依从性,治疗依从性定义为通过观察(亲自观察与视频DOT)核实的规定剂量(每周7天)的比例,并比较在COVID-19之前(2020年3月之前)和COVID-19之后(2020年3月之后)接受治疗的个体;在COVID-19之后的时期内,我们评估了COVID-19早期(2020年3月至8月)和COVID-19期间(2020年8月之后)。
在49例结核病患者中(平均年龄41岁,标准差19;n = 27,55%为女性,n = 47,96%非美国出生),18例(36.7%)在COVID-19之后的时期接受治疗。总体而言,与亲自DOT相比,使用vDOT时核实的依从性(观察剂量的比例)显著更高(平均81%,标准差17.4),而亲自DOT为(平均54.5%,标准差10.9;P = 0.001)。vDOT的采用率从COVID-19之前时期的35%(11/31)的结核病患者显著增加到COVID-19之后时期的6