Department of Human Kinetics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada.
J Athl Train. 2023 May 1;58(5):445-451. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0154.22.
A specific neurodynamic mobilization for the superficial fibular nerve (SFN) has been suggested in the reference literature for manual therapists to evaluate nerve mechanosensitivity in patients. However, no authors of biomechanical studies have examined the ability of this technique to produce nerve strain. Therefore, the mechanical specificity of this technique is not yet established.
To test whether this examination and treatment technique produced nerve strain in the fresh frozen cadaver and the contribution of each motion to total longitudinal strain.
Controlled laboratory study.
Laboratory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A differential variable reluctance transducer was inserted in 10 SFNs from 6 fresh cadavers to measure strain during the mobilization. A specific sequence of plantar flexion, ankle inversion, straight-leg raise position, and 30° of hip adduction was applied to the lower limb. The mobilization was repeated at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of the straight-leg raise position to measure the effect of hip-flexion position.
Compared with a resting position, this neurodynamic mobilization produced a significant amount of strain in the SFN (7.93% ± 0.51%, P < .001). Plantar flexion (59.34% ± 25.82%) and ankle inversion (32.80% ± 21.41%) accounted for the biggest proportions of total strain during the mobilization. No difference was noted among different hip-flexion positions. Hip adduction did not significantly contribute to final strain (0.39% ± 10.42%, P > .05), although high variability among limbs existed.
Ankle motion should be considered the most important factor during neurodynamic assessment of the SFN for distal entrapment. These results suggest that this technique produces sufficient strain in the SFN and could therefore be evaluated in vivo for correlation with mechanosensitivity.
文献中提到一种针对腓浅神经(SFN)的特定神经动态松动术,供手法治疗师用于评估患者的神经感觉敏感性。然而,没有生物力学研究的作者检查过这种技术产生神经应变的能力。因此,这种技术的机械特异性尚未确定。
测试这种检查和治疗技术是否会在新鲜冷冻尸体中引起神经应变,以及每个运动对总纵向应变的贡献。
对照实验室研究。
实验室。
在 10 个来自 6 个新鲜尸体的 SFN 中插入一个差动变量磁阻传感器,以测量松动过程中的应变。下肢依次进行跖屈、踝关节内翻、直腿抬高位和 30°髋关节内收。在直腿抬高位的 0°、30°、60°和 90°重复松动,以测量髋关节屈曲位置的影响。
与休息位置相比,这种神经动态松动术会使 SFN 产生明显的应变(7.93%±0.51%,P<.001)。跖屈(59.34%±25.82%)和踝关节内翻(32.80%±21.41%)在松动过程中占总应变的最大比例。不同髋关节屈曲位置之间没有差异。髋关节内收对最终应变没有显著贡献(0.39%±10.42%,P>.05),尽管肢体之间存在很大的变异性。
在 SFN 的远端嵌压的神经动力学评估中,踝关节运动应被视为最重要的因素。这些结果表明,该技术会使 SFN 产生足够的应变,因此可以在体内进行评估,以与感觉敏感性相关联。